What is a fascist?

Fascists aren't known for their open mindedness.

Its their way or nothing.

But then neither are the Politically Correct brigade.

Its their way or nothing.

But then neither is Islam.

Its their way or nothing.

Taranneh Mousavi

Song and rape


The blog Iranian009 has interviewed one of Taraneh’s friends:

Taraneh M, the young woman we reported on two days ago has been murdered. […]. As we said we have been in contact with one of her friends […]. […] We asked her friend (who will be referred to as Sh. here) to give us a short interview and provide us with more details about this appalling tragedy.
[…]
“Taraneh was very beautiful and very kind, she used to sing with a beautiful warm voice and played the piano with skill. I cannot imagine that all this life and beauty should be buried under dust and dirt, without mercy.”

Sh. is speaking haltingly, and I ask her:

When did the family learn that the body had turned up?

“They went to Ghazvin yesterday to get her burned body. But as much as we asked them they wouldn’t tell us any details and neither did they tell us where they want to bury her. They have been threatened heavily and are very afraid.”

Was Taraneh arrested on 7th Tir (28th June) near Ghoba mosque?

“Yes. On that day, Taraneh was wearing a green shawl and manteau and high heeled shoes and because she also had beautiful green eyes, she probably caught the attention of the plain clothes agents. But she wasn’t participating in the rally and she cried and said so many times to the agents, but they threw her into a van with other detainees. Her car was parked in the vicinity and she was on the way to her Beauticians’ Training Establishment which is situated near Hosseinie Ershad.”

And then they brought her to a detention center?

Yes, they brought her and about 40 other blindfolded boys and girls secret detention center, a building with high walls on Pasdaran Street, and put them in a large room. They were harassing the girls very much and Taraneh’s interrogation took longer than the others’…

Did Taraneh give her phone number to the others there?

“Yes, when she had come back to the others from her long interrogation she said she had been harassed and she asked some other girls and boys to call her parents and some of her friends and tell them that she had been arrested. She was crying all the time, and when they allowed all the girls except her to call home briefly she grew even more worried.

Then they took all the detainees away from this building, some were taken to Evin and others to Nobonyad police station. Only Taraneh they kept with them, which worried all the other detainees.”

And afterwards, were her family and friends contacted?

“Yes, the other detainees who were freed the same evening or in the next days and had the numbers were all worried about Taraneh’s state, as they had seen the savage behaviour of the agents. They called Taraneh’s family and friends and told them she had been arrested.

And did the family follow up on her?

“Yes, after some days they found her Pride car near her workplace but there was no trace of her until last week…”

…when an unidentified person called…

“Yes, an unidentified person, probably one of her abductors, called and said Taraneh had a moral problem and that she hadn’t been arrested at all. He said she had been raped and her womb and anus had been torn and she had wanted to kill herself by throwing herself in front of a car. He said she had been brought to Emam Khomeini Hospital in Karaj and that she had also tried to kill herself there with a serum tube.

The family immediately went to the hospital but Taraneh’s name wasn’t registered at the hospital. However one of the nurses confidentially told one of her friends that some days previously a girl answering these particulars had been brought to the hospital in a state of unconscious and had been removed again after a couple of hours.

Hearing this, we guessed that Taraneh had probably been brought to the hospital in the last moments of her life after suffering repeated rape. We grew very worried.”

At this stage, what enquiries did Taraneh’s family make?

“Our main problem was the family’s silence and the fear they had that the story would come out. Taraneh’s mother and father are very religious and over sixty, Taraneh was their only child, which they had had after years of praying and longing and medication, and they had given her a good life. But when this happened they became very afraid and didn’t talk to us any more. But after all we are her friends too and have a right to know where her body is and where she will be buried!”

Is there no information at all about the funeral ceremony?

“No. Yesterday the family were informed that a burned corpse answering Taraneh’s description had been found in the desert between Karaj and Qazvin. The family has been threatened severely not to talk about their daughter’s arrest.”

Now that this story has come out in the media and in the weblogs, do you think the truth will be found out?

“I just want Taraneh’s voice to go on, and our call that our most beautiful friend has been cruelly taken from us, that they have raped her brutally for several days and then burned her lifeless body and tossed her out in the desert.

When Taraneh sang, her beautiful voice was always in my ear, but from yesterday until now I have only been hearing her screams. Taraneh’s suffering was over, but our pain and suffering will remain with us as long as we live, she was our Taraneh (=song).”

EXCUSE ME BUT . . . . . .Which ever way you look at it these people did this because they could. The Mullahs, the politicians, the president are all guilty because they are doing nothin to stop it. Ahmadinejad is a puppet of the Islamic Fundamentalists. He is not a leader he is a follower.

Muslims clash with police after burning poppy in anti-Armistice Day protest

Muslims clashed with police after burning a large poppy in protest at Britain's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which was timed to coincide with Armistice Day's two-minute silence.

Muslim protestors demonstrate near Hyde Park in London on Armistice Day Photo: AP

Police escort the Muslim protestors into the underground train station after they began the protest Photo: AP

By Andy Bloxham 3:58PM GMT 11 Nov 2010

About 35 Islamic protesters, dressed in dark clothes and with many masking their faces, carried banners and chanted slogans such as "British soldiers: terrorists".

The group confronted police officers and briefly fought with them, leaving one officer with a head injury requiring hospital treatment, and three arrests were made.

Around 50 counter demonstrators from the far-right English Defence League gathered nearby but officers kept the two sides apart.

 

EXCUSE ME BUT . . . . . . .this is so wrong these people must be deported and the wearing of a mask in this situation should be an arrestable offence. You can bet your life if we did the equivalent over in Saudi or Pakistan of Iran we would be beaten mercilessly.

Rape within marriage is 'impossible', claims Muslim cleric

A senior Muslim cleric in charge of Britain’s largest group of sharia law courts has claimed that there is no such thing as rape within marriage.

By Tim Ross, Social Affairs Editor
Published: 7:00AM BST 15 Oct 2010

Maulana Abu Sayeed of the Sharia Council of Britain Photo: AFP/GETTY

Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed said that sex without a wife’s consent was “not good” but could not be called rape.

Sheikh Sayeed, president of the Islamic Sharia Council, was criticised by police and moderate Muslims, who warned that his remarks would make women more reluctant to report sexual assaults.

Rape within marriage has been illegal in Britain since 1991. But according to Sheikh Sayeed, rape is defined in Islamic law as adultery by force. Therefore, if a husband forces himself upon his wife the attack cannot be termed “rape”, he said.

In an interview with the website The Samosa, he said: “Clearly there cannot be any ‘rape’ within the marriage. Maybe ‘aggression’, maybe ‘indecent activity’.

“It is not an aggression, it is not an assault, it is not some kind of jumping on somebody’s individual right. Because when they got married, the understanding was that sexual intercourse was part of the marriage, so there cannot be anything against sex in marriage. Of course, if it happened without her desire, that is no good, that is not desirable. But that man can be disciplined and can be reprimanded.”

Dave Whatton, Chief Constable of Cheshire and spokesman on rape for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said most rapes were committed by someone known to or in a relationship with the victim.

“It is a fundamental principle that sharia law should not replace the laws of the UK,” he said. “Putting out views that rape can be dealt with in another way fundamentally undermines everything we are trying to do.”

Excuse me but . . . why are there Sharia courts in Britain?

13 Year Old Yemeni Child Bride Tied Up, Raped – Bled To Death

Posted by jagoindia on April 13, 2010

SHUEBA, Yemen (AP) — A 13-year-old Yemeni child bride who bled to death shortly after marriage was tied down and forced to have sex by her husband, according to interviews with the child’s mother, police and medical reports.

The girl’s mother, Nijma Ahmed, 50, told the Associated Press that before her daughter lost consciousness, she said that her husband had tied her up and forced himself on her. “She looked like she was butchered,” she said about her daughter’s injuries.

Elham Assi, 13, bled to death hours after she spoke to her mother and just days after she was married to a 23-year-old man. She died on April 2 in the deeply poor Yemeni village of Shueba, some 200 kilometers northwest of the capital. Her husband, Abed al-Hikmi, is in police custody.

The practice of marrying young girls is widespread in Yemen where a quarter of all females marry before the age of 15, according to a 2009 report by the country’s Ministry of Social Affairs. Traditional families prefer young brides because they are seen as more obedient and are expected to have more children.

Legislation to ban child brides has been stalled by opposition from religious leaders. There has been no government comment over the case.

The girl — one of eight siblings — was pushed into marriage after an agreement between her brother and her future-husband to marry each other’s sisters to avoid having to pay expensive bride-prices — a common arrangement in Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East.

According to police notes from the interrogation of the husband, he was upset because he could not consummate their relationship and felt under pressure to prove his manhood.

Assi’s mother said she also tried to persuade her daughter to have sex with her husband so as not to shame the family.

Al-Hikmi took his young bride to a nearby medical clinic, asking a doctor there to administer her tranquilizers so she would not resist his advances. The clinic said it refused.

Al-Hikmi then obtained performance enhancing pills, according to the police interrogation, and that night completed the act while she screamed.

The next day, he returned to the same medical clinic carrying Assi because she could not walk.

“I told him not to go near her for at least ten days,” said Dr. Fathiya Haidar. She said Assi’s vaginal canal was ripped.

A forensic report obtained by the AP showed that Assi’s injuries were much more extensive, including extensive tearing around the vagina and rectum, suggesting that there might have been additional intercourse after the clinic visit.

Her mother said she visited Assi later that day, where she found her daughter fading in and out of consciousness.

“She whispered in my ear that he had tied her up and had sex with her violently,” she said. “I said to her husband, what have you done, you criminal?”

She said al-Hikmi told her that the young bride was just possessed by spirits and said he would take her to a folk healer to cast them out. Hours later, Assi was dead.

“She asked me to stay beside her,” her mother said.

The practice of marrying young girls is widespread in Yemen and has drawn the attention of international rights groups seeking to pressure the government to outlaw child marriages.

“Early marriage places girls at increased risk of dropping out of school, being exposed to violence, abuse and exploitation, and even losing their lives from pregnancy, childbirth and other complications,” said UNICEF’s regional director Sigrid Kaag, in a statement Wednesday condemning the death.

A February 2009 law set the minimum age for marriage at 17, but it was repealed and sent back to parliament’s constitutional committee for review after some lawmakers called it un-Islamic. The committee is expected to make a final decision on the legislation this month.

The issue of Yemen’s child brides received widespread attention three years ago when an 8-year-old girl boldly went by herself to a courtroom and demanded a judge dissolve her marriage to a man in his 30s. She eventually won a divorce.

In September, a 12-year-old Yemeni child-bride died after struggling for three days in labor to give birth, a local human rights organization said.

Excuse me but . . . . .  The mother called the husband a criminal yet she allowed this to happen she even asked the girl to give in to the husband. I think she should be locked up along with the husband.

Understanding Muslim Beliefs .....GOOD READ !!

The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the United States, especially in the minority races!... by Rick Mathes

Last month I attended my annual training session that's required for maintaining my state prison security clearance. During the training session there was a presentation by three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained each of their beliefs. -

I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Imam gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video. When he was finished, a time was provided for questions and answers.

When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Imam and asked: "Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad (Holy war) against the infidels of the world. And that by killing an infidel, which is a command to all Muslims, they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?"

There was no disagreement with my statements and without hesitation, he replied, "Nonbelievers!"

I responded, "So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill anyone who is not of your faith so they can go to Heaven. Is that correct?"

The _expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just gotten caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

He sheepishly replied, "Yes." I then stated, "Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering Protestants to do the same in order to go to Heaven!"

The Imam was speechless. I continued, "I also have problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!

Let me ask you a question. Would you rather have your Allah who tells you to kill me in order to go to Heaven or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to Heaven and He wants you to be with me?"

You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam hung his head in shame. Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with Rick's way of dealing with the Islamic Imam and exposing the truth about the Muslim's beliefs.

I think everyone in the US should be required to read this, but with the liberal justice system, liberal media, and the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized.

Please pass this on to all your e-mail contacts. This is a true story and the author, Rick Mathes, is a well-known leader in prison ministry

I came by his because a friend in the US prison service sent it to me. Snopes interviewed Mathes aand he confirmed it did actually happen. The prision service are reluctant to agree with him.

Whether or not it happened I am in possession of an Islamic book published by a revered Saudi publisher^[1] which says and I quote " The day of judement will not come untill all the Jews are dead". I commented on this to an Egyptian doctor friend of mine and she said it was wrong. "What it should have said was 'infidels'." Who am I to argue?

1. I used to read the books of Saudi publisher Daressalam at work in Saudi. My Saudi friends would say they are the best books to buy on Islam until that is that I started to point out things like that above hen they would say my books were forgeries. Go figure!

IISLAM, peaceful?

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace

"He who fights that Islam should be superior fights in Allah's cause"

Muhammad, prophet of Islam

2010.01.08 (Khyber, Pakistan) - Three children are among five civilians murdered by a Shahid suicide bomber outside a mosque.
2010.01.08 (Bajaur, Pakistan) - Two people are blown to bits by a Taliban roadside bomb.
2010.01.08 (Karachi, Pakistan) - Five mourners at a funeral are shot to death by sectarian Jihadis.
2010.01.07 (Khanaqin, Iraq) - Three Iraqis are cut down by a Jihadi bomb.
2010.01.07 (Yala, Thailand) - A man is ripped in two by a Religion of Peace nail bomb.
2010.01.07 (Hit, Iraq) - Women and children are among the dead when Mujahideen detonate planted bombs around the bedrooms of four homes.

FYI

ENEMY OF THE STATE

I don’t give a shit about democracy when it comes to that paedophile worshiping terrorist/coward Anjem Choudary. This is a man who though he hates us here in GB is  living off our hard earned cash to the tune of £25,000 a year tax free. You and I are giving this hate preacher a salary while he plots to kill innocent people. His ‘rights’ are of no importance whatsoever.

The face of Islamic EVIL

This man thinks we owe him while all the time he is plotting to kill real British people. Our government should run him out of the country now. There are 70 Islamic Republics in the world let him pick one and go there.  He is not worth the ink in the bill of rights.

How dare this government allow this violent racist to stay in our country and pay him while he plots to kill real British subjects.

He may have been born here and educated here but he will never be British. He lacks the fundamental properties of a Brit.  He is by association a child abuser, by faith a terrorist, by his own voice an enemy of the state.

This shit can be stopped

These criminals can be stopped.
CLOSE THE BORDERS

No Borders PAH!!!

Greenpeace, limp wristed lefties,veggies, vegans and a whole host of other save the planet types have jumped on the band wagon of the NO BORDERS Brigade, who as far as I can work out have the idea that we should open our borders to all and sundry.

Fine idea except its a one way street. Open our borders and every one will come here and swamp us, bankrupting our benefit system. Corrupting our culture. and generally lowering our standards. Having been to some of the places that would dump their unwanted on us I don’t think there will be a rush of westerners wanting to go to the shit pits of the world. Net result we suffer. 

On the other hand we could export all the Greenpeace, limp wristed lefties,veggies, vegans and a whole host of other save the planet types to these places and give them an education in why there NO BORDERS policy is a non starter.

This is not a racist rant it is simple common sense. This is a small island. What we have here was paid for with the blood of our soldiers on many occasions. It didn’t just get given to us. It was earned. It is unfair that anyone should be able to just step off a plane and expect to take from us what we and our fore fathers bled for and paid taxes for, for centuries. Our lives as we have them now were not cheap.

I am not saying foreign nationals are not entitled to a better life but they could try fighting for it at home instead of coming here and overloading our system. When our society collapses they will all bugger of home and leave us to the wolves.

A nation of peados

12-year old Girl Dies During Childbirth
Associated Press
September 14, 2009
SAN'A, Yemen -- A 12-year-old Yemeni child-bride died after struggling for three days in labor to give birth, a local human rights organization said Saturday.

Fawziya Abdullah Youssef died of severe bleeding on Friday while giving birth to a stillborn in the al-Zahra district hospital of Hodeida province, 140 miles (223 kilometers) west of the capital San'a.

Child marriages are widespread in Yemen, the Arab world's poorest country, where tribal customs dominate society. More than a quarter of the country's females marry before age 15, according to a recent report by the Social Affairs Ministry.

Youssef was only 11 when her father married her to a 24-year-old man who works as a farmer in Saudi Arabia, said Ahmed al-Quraishi, chairman of Siyaj human rights organization, which promotes the rights of children in Yemen.

Al-Quraishi said that he stumbled upon Youssef in the hospital while investigating cases of children who had fled from the fighting in the north.

"This is one of many cases that exist in Yemen," said al-Quraishi. "The reason behind it is the lack of education and awareness, forcing many girls into marriage in this very early age.

"Impoverished parents in Yemen sometimes give away their young daughters in return for hefty dowries. There is also a long-standing tribal custom in which infant daughters and sons are promised to cousins in hopes it will protect them from illicit relationships, he said.

Al-Quraishi said there are no statistics to show how many marriages involving children are performed every year.

The issue of child brides vaulted into the headlines here two years ago when an 8-year-old Yemeni girl went by herself to a courtroom and demanded a judge dissolve her marriage to a man in his 30s. She eventually won a divorce, and legislators began looking at ways to curb the practice.

In February, parliament passed a law setting the minimum marriage age at 17. But some lawmakers are trying to kill the measure, calling it un-Islamic. Before it could be ratified by Yemen's president, they forced it to be sent back to parliament's constitutional committee for review.

Such marriages also occur in neighboring oil-rich Saudi Arabia, where several cases of child brides have been reported in the past year, though the phenomenon is not believed to be nearly as widespread as in Yemen.

EXCUSE ME BUT . . . . . . . THis sort of thig is bound to happen when you lord ad glorify the name of a pedophile as your spiritual leader . . Mohammed.

US father guilty of prayer death.

Man found guilty over death of his daughter for praying rather than seeking medical help.

A man accused of killing his 11-year-old diabetic daughter by praying instead of seeking medical care has been found guilty of second-degree reckless homicide.

Dale Neumann, 47, was convicted over the March 23, 2008, death of his daughter, Madeline, from undiagnosed diabetes.

Prosecutors argued he should have rushed the girl to a hospital because she could not walk, talk, eat or drink.

Instead, Madeline died on the floor of the family's rural home as people surrounded her and prayed. Someone called an ambulance when she stopped breathing.

Neumann, who once studied to be a Pentecostal minister, testified that he believed God would heal his daughter and he never expected her to die. God promises in the Bible to heal, he said.

"If I go to the doctor, I am putting the doctor before God," Neumann testified. "I am not believing what he said he would do."

Excuse me but . . . . did it never occur to this joker that if God made everything then he made doctors. Going to the doctor is not putting the doctor before God but simply using one of his tools.

This idiot deserves to go to jail.

Winning is all

A small schoolboy at the sports day breaks the winning line with his egg still on his spoon. Overjoyed at his prowess as racing balancer of eggs he raises his arms in the air pronouncing for all present that he is the WINNER!

A teacher witnessing this takes the lad to one side and totally destroys his moment. "There are no winners its just a bit of fun", she says.

This does not make the slowcoach at the back feel any less last. Everyone knows he/she was last. All that has been achieved is one 5 year old's moment of glory has been dashed by some teacher with her PC head up her arse.

Its no wonder that our children are failing if we are teaching them that winning is not important.

Winning is the most important thing we have. It means that someone was the first to discover penicillin, it means that some one was first to discover X-rays, it means that someone was the first to find a cure for a cancer; it means that someone was first to invent anesthetic . . . . need I go on.

Winning is important to me. Had someone not had the enthusiasm to say we can do this and discovered inert optical plastics I would be blind.

We don't speak German because we won the war. We will loose the peace if we don't win anymore.

Women flogged for wearing trousers

Police in Sudan have arrested 13 women in a raid on a cafe and flogged 10 of them in public for wearing trousers in violation of the country's strict Islamic law, one of those arrested has said.

The 13 women were at a cafe in the capital, Khartoum, when they were detained on Friday by officers from the public order police, which enforces the implementation of Sharia law in public places.

One of those arrested on Friday, journalist Lubna Hussein, said she is challenging the charges, which can be punishable by up to 40 lashes.

"I didn't do anything wrong," said Ms Hussein.

Islamic Sharia law has been strictly implemented in Sudan since the ruling party came to power in a 1989 military coup.

The force randomly enforces an alcohol ban and often scolds young men and women mingling in public. Public order cases usually involve quick summary trials with sentences carried out shortly afterward, as was the case with 10 of the women arrested on Friday. They were flogged and fined 250 Sudanese pounds (£74).

Ms Hussein and two other women chose to go to trial. On Monday she was summoned for questioning and now awaits a decision from the prosecutor on when the case could go to trial.

Women in northern Sudan, particularly in Khartoum, dress in traditional outfits that include a shawl over their head and shoulder. Western dress is uncommon.

Ms Hussein said she decided to speak out because flogging is a practice many women endure in silence. She even sent printed invitations to the press and public figures to attend her expected trial.

"Let the people see for themselves. It is not only my issue," she said. "This is retribution to thousands of girls who are facing flogging for the last 20 years because of wearing trousers. They prefer to remain silent."

Excuse me but . . . . . . . Dont think this cant happen here it can and it does. The Islamic Republic of Great Britian is just around the corner.

Saudi Judge Blames Women For Domestic Violence

Okays Husbands To Slap Wives

Posted in May 11th, 2009 by Glenn Church in Saudi Arabia

Few countries contrast the twenty-first century with the values of antiquity as Saudi Arabia does. A wealthy, modern state would seem to have a few progressive ideas. Not so with the Saudis.

A Saudi judge has ruled that it is okay for husbands to slap their wives if they spend too much.

That wasn’t all Judge Hamid Al-Razine had to say. He noted, “women’s indecent behavior and use of offensive words against their husbands were some of the reasons for domestic violence in the country.”

Domestic violence is on the rise in Saudi Arabia in recent years. Of course, the woman is to blame.

It would be unthinkable to consider otherwise in a society that does not allow women to drive or men and women to mix in public. Yet, the same society allows a 47-year-old man to marry an 8-year-old girl.

All this is done in the pretext of protecting women or upholding morality. Is there really that much difference between the Saudis and the Taliban? Both cherish oppressive ideologies and suppress women.

Why, yes, there is a difference. The Saudis sell us their oil.

Americans die in Afghanistan with one of the pretenses being the liberation of women from a repressive ideology. In Saudi Arabia, they work with the Saudis to provide the world with oil. For that, the Saudis always get a free ride, unless you are a Saudi woman.

Mosque inquiry will cost taxpayers £100k

Taxpayers will pick up a £100,000 bill for the planning inquiry which resurrected plans for a Black Country mosque, it has been revealed.

The cost of the four-day hearing will be met by Dudley Council after the Government’s planning inspectorate overturned its decision to reject the £18 million proposal.

The authority was forced to hire security staff to police the summit at the inspector’s request - but will not receive a penny from Whitehall to cover costs.

The decision to allow the appeal for the project in Hall Street, Dudley, was this week announced after the public inquiry in June.

Dudley Council boss David Caunt described the decision as a “sad day” for local democracy saying it ignored the 22,000 people who signed a petition in opposition.

And Councillor Caunt said that the £100,000 bill rubbed salt in the wound.

“I’m very frustrated that a one man government-appointed judge and jury can turn up, listen to the arguments for four days and drive around the borough before coming to the conclusion that he knows better than the locals." The councillor added: “And then we have to pick up the bill for it".

“The security was requested by the inspector himself, but we have to pay,” he went on to say. The council chief warned the price of the inquiry could even run over the authority’s initial £100,000 estimate because of the tight security measures.

Work on the mosque, featuring a 65-feet minaret, could start before Christmas. However the plans could yet be scuppered by a land-swap deal which states that the building must be “substantially” built by the end of the year.

Dudley Muslim Association now has outline planning permission for the scheme, but still needs to submit a detailed application which the council has up to 13 weeks to determine.

When the site was transferred to the association in 2003 there was a legal agreement that if the project was not “substantially” completed by the end of this year the land would be returned to the council. Muslim leaders have called for an extension to the deadline.

Mushtaq Hussain, secretary of Dudley Muslim Association, said: “We always maintained the condition was subject to us getting planning permission and having a reasonable and realistic time to get the project completed".

NUFF SED

Wealthy bride's kin allegedly killed poverty-stricken groom's relatives

PATNA, India - Eight members of a man's poverty-ridden family were shot and beheaded before their bodies were thrown into a river in eastern India after he secretly married a wealthy girl, police said Wednesday.

Police in the eastern state of Bihar found the eight bodies floating in a river and have charged 15 people, mostly from the girl's family, with the murders. The weekend killing took place after 21-year-old Ratan Mandal eloped with 18-year-old Kanchan Kumari, afraid their families would never approve due to an old social rivalry.

"The girl's family invited the boy's family for a meeting on the pretext of settling the dispute, but killed all eight and beheaded them," said Raghunath Prasad Singh, a senior police officer from Bhagalpur, where the incident took place. Lawless region Bhagalpur, one of India's most lawless regions, has been notorious for revenge and honor killings. Men and women are still murdered across the villages of eastern and northern India for daring to marry outside their caste.

In May last year, a young couple was murdered by the girl's family in northern India for marrying within the same village, considered taboo in many communities.

Paki or Brit

Am I right in thinking that PAKI is short for Pakistani? Just an abbreviation?
Prince Harry calls a mate "Our little Paki friend" and is forced to apologise two years later. This guy was a mate of his for heaven's sake! Am I right in thinking that "Brit" is short for British?

Should the SunNewspaper be forced to apologise every time it prints the word Brit or The Brits are coming? Is the word Brit offensive? Is "Scot" Offensive? "The Scots are coming". Another Sun Newspaper Football Clash Headline classic. What about Ozzie? Kiwi? Pommie? Limey? Where or when will this lunacy end?

The Cornish call all holiday makers "Grockles" Anything wrong with that? If a Pakistani called you "His Brit friend" Would you feel offended? Would you demand an apology on National TV? Of course not. Del Trotter refers to "The Paki Shop" in one episode of Only Fools and Horses. (Now overdubbed for UK Gold with the offending word taken out - the episode is when they build a nuclear fall out shelter). Should Sir David Jason now apologise? Should the writer John Sullivan apologise? Should the BBC apologise? What about the Fuzzywuzzies? "Dads Army" What about "You stupid Kraut"? Fawlty Towers . Both still being broadcast regularly with no overdub.

The Idiots are at it again trying to stir up racial hatred. It's just madness surely? I'm happy being a BRIT, BRITISH, ENGLISH, POMMIE, LIMEY or whatever. I don't care a fig. I only care when I'm called a racist. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEARS "BRIT AWARDS" ON THE TV. LUCKILY,THANKS TO THE ZEALOTS, RACISTS AND BIGOTS THERE WILL NEVER BE A "PAKI AWARDS". Oh no indeed, because all the Pakis will be at The Brit Awards. And us Brits won't mind at all will we?

There's something rotten in the barrel and nobody in government or local politics has the guts to stand up and say " GROW UP THE LOT OF YOU". If you agree then pass this on. If not then you still have the Democratic right to ignore it ............. (well for the time being anyway)!

Palestine

The Palestine you are encouraged to see looks like this





However there is a Palestine they dont want you to see and it looks like this

Sheffield

Just incase you didnt know in Sheffield you cannot get buried on a Saturday unles you are a Muslem.

Excuse me but. . . . . . . . Whose country is this?

Why oh why oh why

OIC to move UNGA against caricatures

Staff Report

ISLAMABAD: A resolution against the publication of blasphemous caricatures of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) in various countries will be presented in the upcoming session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), an Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) representative said on Tuesday.

“The resolution will demand legislation against the publication of blasphemous caricatures of revered personalities and derogatory remarks against religions. It will also demand [sacrilegious] actions be declared a crime,” OIC Secretary General’s Special Representative on Kashmir Ezzat Kamel Mufti told a news conference.

Mufti said a particular group in America and the European Union had been launching attacks against Islam. “However, we should not get emotional and resort to any kind of violence, including suicide bombings,” he said.

Excuse me but......... it is not blasphemous if you are not religious ie a believer can be blasphemous but a non believer cant except in the eyes of those who chose to follow this nonsense.

MOROCCO:FATWA IN FAVOUR OF 9-YEAR-OLD GIRL MARRIAGE,POLEMICS

"A nine-year-old girl has the same sexual capacities like a woman of twenty and over". Thus reads a fatwa issued by Skeikh Mohamed Ibn Abderrahmane Al-Maghraoui, according to Moroccan daily 'Aujourd'hui Le Maroc'. This immediately sparked off a hot debate, with most of the public opinion absolutely against this stance which is a permit for paedophilia, many say, among other things. Among the various stances against the fatwa (in the Islamic culture, a decree of religious character issued by Islamic experts which regulates issues of topical character), the daily reported those of extremist MP Abdelbari Zamzami and the president of association 'No one touches my children', Najia Adib. Zamzami, referring to the fact that Al-Maghraoui wanted to make his fatwa unassailable reminding that Muhammad "married Aisha who was nine", reiterated that the sheikh used the event as a pretext for this "scandalous practice". "The era of our Prophet is completely different from ours," he said on the issue. "These days a marriage of the kind would be a true injustice towards the girl. A true aberration." "Aberrant" was also the judgement of Najia Adib ('No one touches my children'), according to whom "this sheikh is simply encouraging paedophilia. If he is so deeply convinced of what he thinks, let's tell him to get his daughter married". But perhaps, she explains, this unknown sheikh was searching a little media attention. And concluded her interview with the Moroccan daily: "This type of people look at Islam from the point of view which is convenient for them. It is a restrictive vision of Islam. And it is bad. Fatwas like these show the lack of reasoning from those who issue them. I cannot understand via what intellectual road or for what mental construction they come to such aberrations". The law in Morocco envisages the minimum age for getting married at 18 years for both men and women. Marrying below this age requires the consent of the parents and of a judge. But it refers to teenagers not children.

Excuse me but. . . . . . . This is the sort of shit you get when your leader was a kiddie fiddler.

One error in the text is Mohhamad married Ayesha when she was 6 not nine. He was nowt but a dirty pervert.

A young student who was doing a photojournalism report on illeagal immigration was brutally raped by probably ten IM of middle eastern appearance in a shanty town in Calais.

These bastards are not the sort of people who we need here. They have no respect for our laws or our culture. Theirs is the only way.

Question: Why is France allowing this shanty town to exist so near the port.

Answer: They have never forgiven us for getting their arse out of a sling 60 years ago and 20years before that.

Do they really care if these bastards come over here I very much doubt it.

This might solve one problem

The British Solution to Save Petrol

Brown wants us to cut the amount of petrol we use......

The best way to stop using so much petrol is to deport 3 million illegal immigrants!

That would be 3 million less people using our petrol. The price of petrol would come down.....

Bring our troops home from Iraq to guard the Channel....

When they catch an illegal immigrant crossing the Channel, hand him a canteen, rifle and some ammo and ship him to Iraq ....

Tell him if he wants to come to Britain then he must serve a tour in the military....

Give him a soldier's pay while he's there and tax him on it.....

After his tour, he will be allowed to become a citizen since he defended this country.....

He will also be registered to be taxed and be a legal resident..... .

This option will probably deter illegal immigration and provide a solution for the troops in Iraq and the aliens trying to make a better life for themselves.. ....

If they refuse to serve, ship them to Iraq anyway, without the canteen, rifle or ammo.....

Problem solved.....

Ssri Lankan Police CSU are nothin but barbarians

Mannar CSU rapes pregnant woman

[TamilNet, March 28, 2001 18:07 GMT]

"Wijikala was screaming inside the building. I heard her pleading 'I have nothing to do with the Tigers. I am a family woman. Please do not do this to me'. Then some CSU men came out and told me that they were forcing Wijikala to have sex with them and threatened to rape me as well. One of the men tried to strip my clothes. When they saw that my son was asleep on my lap, a Policeman dragged him away into one of the buildings in the CSU compound as I begged them not to hurt him. Two men then pinned me down on the van's floor while another stripped me and raped me. I was screaming and pleading when a Policeman put his foot on my mouth to stifle me. Inside the building they forced Wijikala, who was standing naked, to strip my underwear. I was hung upside down in a knot from a pole placed between two tables, with my hands and feet tied. Then the men in the room poked our genitals and tortured us until dawn", said Sivamani Sinnathamby Weerakon, the young mother of three who was arrested by the Counter Subversive Unit (CSU) of the Police in Mannar on 13 March. Wijikala Nanthan, 22, of Alavetty in Jaffna who was arrested with Sivamani, is pregnant.

The two women were produced before the Mannar district judge M.H.M Ajmeer by the CSU at his residence and were remanded in judicial custody for fourteen days. The judge instructed the Mannar prisons officer to have the women examined by a medical officer forthwith. Wijikala, according to her relatives, is pregnant and was raped repeatedly by Policemen in CSU custody.

The Mannar Bishop and human rights activists said Wednesday that the CSU has often been in the habit of arresting women such as Sivamani and Wijikala from various parts of the Mannar district to rape and exploit brutally under the pretext of interrogation and extended detention under the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Emergency Regulations.

Sivamani said that more than ten uniformed persons surrounded the Aasika lodge in Uppukkulam, a suburb of Mannar town, on 13 March around 11 p.m. Sivamani was staying in the lodge with her son as her husband had gone to Vavuniya to find work. Wijikala and her husband, Shanmugam Nanthan, were staying in the room next to hers.

The men from the CSU entered the lodge and checked the men and women separately. They separated Sivamani and accused her of being a member of the Liberation Tigers. Sivamani denied their charges and showed them her family album to prove that she was a person with children and a family. She told the CSU personnel that she was staying in the lodge with her son. They had then dragged her son from bed to the main hall of the lodge where they were questioning the inmates. The boy was taken to a corner of the hall and questioned by the CSU men. Sivamani said she could see that the boy was too sleepy to answer any of their questions and threats.

"However, they came back and threatened me, claiming that my son had confessed that I was a trained member of the Liberation Tigers. I cried and pleaded with them that it was obvious that my son was too sleepy and could not tell them anything. But they insisted that I was a Tiger. Then they got Wijikala search my person and me to check her".

"Then we, Nanthan, Wijikala, my son and I, were taken in a white van to a place in the town, which I recognised the next day as the compound in which the Mannar CSU office is located. There, Nanthan and his wife Wijikala were pulled out of the van and were dragged into a building in the compound. After a while I heard Wijikala screaming and pleading. Some Policemen who from the building, told me in lurid detail about how they were forcing sex on Wijikala and threatened that they would do the same to me. They me told me that the OIC wants to see me. But I begged them not to harm my little son".

Sivamani was then raped in the van while her six-year-old son was dragged away into the CSU office. She was thereafter taken to the CSU's Officer in Charge (OIC) Suraweera. Sivamani saw Wijikala standing stark naked in the room surrounded by more than five CSU men.

"The OIC, a tall fair man with a beard, ordered me to strip naked when I was made to stand before him with most of my dress torn and stripped. I was whipped with thick wires when I refused to remove my clothes. The pain was so unbearable that I was compelled to take off my skirt and blouse. But the CSU men insisted that I should remove my under wear as well. I refused. Thereupon a man poked a stick into my underwear and tried to tear them. Then they forced Wijikala to remove my undergarments and pushed me to the brightly lit part of the room close to the OIC".

Sivamani said that Inspector of Police (IP) Suraweera, the OIC, had lasciviously scrutinised her private parts when she was pushed near him by the other Policemen in the room.

She was then tied up and hung upside down in a crouching position on a pole placed between two tables in the room and tortured until dawn, 14 March. The torture was so severe that Sivamani and Wijikala had agreed to say that they were military trained members of the Liberation Tigers who had brought bombs to Mannar from the Vanni.

Three days later they were ordered, while in the custody of the CSU, to sign confessions typed in Sinhala to the effect that they were members of the LTTE, had come to Mannar with bombs etc,

Sivamani said she was from the village of Ramanathapuram in Kilinochchi . She was married to a Sinhalese fifteen years ago when she was fourteen. She has three children. Her husband, Ranbanda Weerakon Banda of Matale, left Kilinochchi in 1994 to find work in Vavuniya. Sivamani heard in 1999 that he had married another woman there. She had come to Vavuniya and met her husband in November 2000. Ranbanda had then put her up in a house in, Nelukkulam, a suburb of the northern border town.

A few days later he had brought his mistress to the same house. Earlier this month Sivamani decided to leave the house as she could no longer stand the squabbles with her husband's mistress. She had therefore set out to Mannar so that she could go back to the Vanni. Her husband had, however, gone along with her and put her up at the Aasika lodge and returned to Vavuniya. Despite being informed by the ICRC about her wife's situation, Ranbanda has not come to Mannar so far to see Sivamani, sources said.

Sivamani said that CSU personnel have threatened both her and Wijikala not to give evidence against them if there is a case in courts.

Sharia Law

So a top judge has said Sharia Law could play a role Britains Legal system. This is definately a case of being out of touch with the masses. WE dont want it! Many of the Moslems who came here to escape the horror of Sharia Law dont want it. So arent we glad twats like him don't make the law.

There are about 70 Islamic republics in the world, these are some of the poorest and most repressed, let those who want to live under Sharia Law move to one of them. Like it or not we are a predominantly Christian country and our laws are based on Christian principles. We like it that way.

Your Honour...... go wash your mouth out.

Hypocrites

I find it difficult to believe that the men who found these an insult........

..........think these are acceptable

Oh it gets worse

The adoption of some aspects of Islamic sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable", the Archbishop of Canterbury has said.

Dr Rowan Williams said there was a place for finding a "constructive accommodation" in areas such as marriage - allowing Muslim women to avoid western divorce proceedings.

Other religions enjoyed such tolerance of their own laws, he pointed out, but stressed that it could never be allowed to take precedence over an individual's rights as a citizen.

He said it would also require a change in perception of what sharia involved beyond the "inhumanity" of extreme punishments and attitudes to women seen in some Islamic states.

Dr Williams told BBC Radio 4's The World At One: "It seems unavoidable and, as a matter of fact, certain conditions of sharia are already recognised in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system.

"We already have in this country a number of situations in which the internal law of religious communities is recognised by the law of the land as justifying conscientious objections in certain circumstances."

Prime Minister Gordon Brown's spokesman insisted that British law would be based on British values, and Sharia law would be no justification for acting against national law. But he also said concessions could be made in specific instances, such as a relaxation of the law on stamp duty to avoid it being paid twice when Sharia-compliant mortgages were used by Muslims.

Mr Brown's spokesman said: "In relation to Sharia law, there are instances where the Government has made changes - for example, we have changed the regulation around stamp duty to include Sharia-compliant mortgages." They involve two transfers of property, so in theory stamp duty would be payable twice - but is in fact paid only once.

The spokesman went on: "Our general position is that Sharia law cannot be used as a justification for committing breaches of English law, nor should the principles of Sharia law be included in a civil court for resolving contractual disputes.

"If there are specific instances like stamp duty, where changes can be made in a way that's consistent with British law and British values, in a way to accommodate the values of fundamental Muslims, that is something the Government would look at. There is always going to be a debate about this issue."

Excuse me but . . . . . . . . . . . . if there are muslims in this country who are not happy with our laws there is a simple answer. There are 72 Muslim republics in the world they could move there.

Why are we thinking of changing our laws for foreigners. I have spent some time abroad and know that they would not change their laws for us.

Story: An arab driver with no insurance, licence or tax on his poorly maintained car crashed into an american. The police were called and the case went to court. Although the evedence was clear, the Arab was in the wrong, the case went against the American for two reasons:-

A: The arab had no money.

B: Had the American not been in Saudi the arab would never have hit the American.

There is a word for this kind of behavior, I thought corruption might fill the bill but it is much more than that. Racism may sort of say something near to the mark. Whatever it is it is rotten and it's the way these people want this country to be.

We should not stand for it. We should make sure our leaders know that we are not prepared to accept other peoples law in our country. Loudly

This would be nice

WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT TO TURN ON THE TV AND HEAR ANY U.S. PRESIDENT, DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN GIVE THE FOLLOWING SPEECH?

My Fellow Americans: As you all know, the defeat of Iraq regime has been completed.

Since congress does not want to spend any more money on this war, our mission in Iraq is complete.

This morning I gave the order for a complete removal of all American forces from Iraq. This action will be complete within 30 days. It is now time to begin the reckoning.

Before me, I have two lists. One list contains the names of countries which have stood by our side during the Iraq conflict. This list is short. The United Kingdom, Spain, Bulgaria, Australia, and Poland are some of the countries listed there.

The other list contains everyone not on the first list. Most of the world's nations are on that list. My press secretary will be distributing copies of both lists later this evening.

Let me start by saying that effective immediately, foreign aid to those nations on List 2 ceases immediately and indefinitely. The money saved during the first year alone will pretty much pay for the costs of the Iraqi war.

The American people are no longer going to pour money into third world Hell-holes and watch those government leaders grow fat on corruption.

Need help with a famine? Wrestling with an epidemic? Call France.

In the future, together with Congress, I will work to redirect this money toward solving the vexing social problems we still have at home. On that note, a word to terrorist organizations. Screw with us and we will hunt you down and eliminate you and all your friends from the face of the earth.

Thirsting for a gutsy country to terrorize? Try France, or maybe China.

I am ordering the immediate severing of diplomatic relations with France, Germany, and Russia. Thanks for all your help, comrades. We are retiring from NATO as well. Bon chance, mes amis.

I have instructed the Mayor of New York City to begin towing the many UN diplomatic vehicles located in Manhattan with more than two unpaid parking tickets to sites where those vehicles will be stripped, shredded and crushed. I don't care about whatever treaty pertains to this. You creeps have tens of thousands of unpaid tickets. Pay those tickets tomorrow or watch your precious Benzes, Beamers and limos be turned over to some of the finest chop shops in the world. I love New York

A special note to our neighbors. Canada is on List 2 Since we are likely to be seeing a lot more of each other, you folks might want to try not pissing us off for a change.

Mexico is also on List 2. President Fox and his entire corrupt government really need an attitude adjustment. I will have a couple extra tank and infantry divisions sitting around. Guess where I am going to put em? Yep, border security. So start doing something with your oil.

Oh, by the way, the United States is abrogating the NAFTA treaty - starting now.

We are tired of the one-way highway. Immediately, we'll be drilling for oil in Alaska - which will take care of this country's oil needs for decades to come. If you're an environmentalist who opposes this decision, I refer you to List 2 above: pick a country and move there. They care.

It is time for America to focus on its own welfare and its own citizens. Some will accuse us of isolationism. I answer them by saying, "darn tootin."

Nearly a century of trying to help folks live a decent life around the world has only earned us the undying enmity of just about everyone on the planet. It is time to eliminate hunger in America. It is time to eliminate homelessness in America. It is time to eliminate World Cup Soccer from America. To the nations on List 1, a final thought. Thanks guys. We owe you and we won't forget. To the nations on List 2, a final thought: You might want to learn to speak Arabic. God bless America. Thank you and good night. If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.

(Please forward this to at least ten friends and see what happens! Let's get this to every Allied computer!

This I don't believe

Today Pakistan announced that they have tested a missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

There will be tears before bedtime.

This is clearly a case of the "lunatics have taken over the asylum". The responsibility of managing a nuclear weapons system should never be left in the hands of a tribal midget like Pervez Musharraf.

He has proved he is not a responsible leader. He is not even a good man. Honour is not among his attributes nor is truth in his vocabulary.

World peace depends on many things. If I had to think of one thing I would stop to actually help WP it would be the removal of nuclear arsenals for the control of muppets like Mursharraf.

They What?

The British Army are being accused of glorifing war in ther adverts.

Excuse me but isnt that what advertising is all about?

Imangine if car adverts told prospective the road death toll or if ads for McDonalds included obesity death rates. Wouldnt that be silly? Yes of course it would. So why are the Army expected to do it.

I am thinking that who ever came up with this gem neds to get a life. Of course the Army dont really want recruits to think about getting their heads blown off, or shot to death. Please a little common sense would be in order. I would very much doubt that any one in the Army would allow a young lad to go out to Iraq without A)preparing them and B)letting them know a few things aabout the job and the risks.

Demark again

n 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism - one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other Western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as freethinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism. Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education.

It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?

By the 1990s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.

The New York Post in 2002 ran an article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:

• Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending."

• "Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes." "Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane".

• "Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem"

• "Muslim leaders openly declare their go al of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect."

If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.

It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other! European countries and the U.S.: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish, friend Elsa - who as a teenager had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years -one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration.

Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. Denmark's effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of "racism" by liberal media across Europe! - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration. If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test.

You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.

You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. "We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.

The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now," he said.

A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, "The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference," Hvilshoj says, "There is an inverse correlation between ho! w many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come."

And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, "In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech."

Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.

The Muslim reply came soon after: The religion of peace, eh? Her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.

Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Americans clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in America look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history... we would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own. AMERICA - TIME TO SMELL THE ROSES.

I hope you pass it on to everyone on your mailing list and may it go around to everyone in the U.S.A.

They what!!!!!!!!!

Today on the TV I watched a deaf couple and their young child. I could not believe that they said they were overjoyed when their child was diagnosed as deaf.

Excuse me but . . . . . . What kind of parents are 'overjoyed' that their children are disabled?

Answer:- BAD ONES!!!

Do what?

Its not enough that Sudanese clerics are making monkeys out of us over Mohamed the Teddy Bear but now we are doing the same of ourselves.

NHS chiefs in Dewsbury are insisting that the bed of Moslem patients are turned to face mecca during prayer times. Like our nurses don't have enough to do.

What these fucking idiots dont seem to realise is that according to Islaic law moslems dont have to pray if they are too ill to do so. Any sane man would say that if someone cannot get out of bed then he is too ill.

Excuse me but . . . . . . who's country is this?

Teddy row teacher verdict reaction

Gillian Gibbons will be deported after serving her sentence.
British teacher Gillian Gibbons, 54, from Liverpool, has been sentenced to 15 days in prison in Sudan after she allowed her pupils to call a teddy bear Muhammad.
Politicians and religious leaders gave their response to the court's decision.



DR MUHAMMAD ABDUL BARI, MUSLIM COUNCIL OF BRITAIN
This case should have required only simple common sense to resolve. It is unfortunate that the Sudanese authorities were found wanting in this most basic of qualities.
They grossly overreacted in this sad affair. Gillian should never have been arrested, let alone charged and convicted of committing a crime.
We hope that Gillian will be able to return home without much further delay.

BISHOP OF LIVERPOOL, THE RIGHT REVEREND JAMES JONES, ASKED HOW HE FELT ABOUT THE DECISION
Obviously relief that there won't be the public lashing which everybody feared, but deep disappointment because this was clearly a mistake and I know that the Muslim community here in Liverpool will be as disappointed as anybody.
I think, too, a real anxiety that something like this so badly handled in this way [and] won't do anything to build up good relations between the faith communities.

LOUISE ELLMAN MP, LIVERPOOL RIVERSIDE
What was an innocent error escalated into a charge, and a charge of which she's now been found guilty.
The fear was that this wasn't seen as an individual issue but as something that could get bound up in international politics.

MIKE BLAKEMORE, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
The sentence is a mockery of justice and Amnesty International consider Gillian to be a prisoner of conscience.
She should be immediately and unconditionally released.

CATHERINE WOLTHUIZEN, FAIR TRIALS ABROAD
There was no intent on her part.
A number of people have come forward and made that very clear, both in Sudan and here, that at worst it was just a misunderstanding based on naivety, but even so that a number of her colleagues at the time saw very little wrong, or very little that was likely to cause any offence, in terms of the naming of the bear.
So I think she is not someone who has sought to cause offence, she's not someone who's acted foolishly, but she perhaps hasn't necessarily understood the extent to which some of the parents might have been sensitive to the use of this name.

DR ROWAN WILLIAMS, ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY
I can't see any justification for this at all.
I think that this is an absurdly disproportionate response to what is at best a minor cultural faux pas. And I think that it's done the Sudanese government no credit whatever.

Excuse me but . . . . . What do these people think these tinpot countries are? They are the bottom of the scale when it comes to common sense. We cannot afford religion in this day and age much less Islam. Dont take my word for it read www.prophetofdoom.net

Saudi police 'stopped' fire rescue

Saudi Arabia's religious police stopped schoolgirls from leaving a blazing building because they were not wearing correct Islamic dress, according to Saudi newspapers.

In a rare criticism of the kingdom's powerful "mutaween" police, the Saudi media has accused them of hindering attempts to save 15 girls who died in the fire on Monday. About 800 pupils were inside the school in the holy city of Mecca when the tragedy occurred.

According to the al-Eqtisadiah daily, firemen confronted police after they tried to keep the girls inside because they were not wearing the headscarves and abayas (black robes) required by the kingdom's strict interpretation of Islam.

One witness said he saw three policemen "beating young girls to prevent them from leaving the school because they were not wearing the abaya".

The Saudi Gazette quoted witnesses as saying that the police - known as the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice - had stopped men who tried to help the girls and warned "it is a sinful to approach them".

The father of one of the dead girls said that the school watchman even refused to open the gates to let the girls out.

"Lives could have been saved had they not been stopped by members of the Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice," the newspaper concluded.

Relatives' anger

Families of the victims have been incensed over the deaths.

Most of the victims were crushed in a stampede as they tried to flee the blaze.

The school was locked at the time of the fire - a usual practice to ensure full segregation of the sexes.

The religious police are widely feared in Saudi Arabia. They roam the streets enforcing dress codes and sex segregation, and ensuring prayers are performed on time.

Those who refuse to obey their orders are often beaten and sometimes put in jail.

Excuse me but....... What virtue was being promoted by mudering these school children.?

What vice was prevented by murdering these school children?

NONE, absolutely fucking none.

Surprising

Have you ever stop to think about the understanding of the English language by Presidents and Princes. In so many of the worlds countries where Democratic appears in the name, democracy rarely appears in the constitution.

Jehova's Witness

So a Jehova's Witness child molester is freed from court because the Judge says he has his faith. Err... Had he not been a JW elder he would not have been able to abuse the children he did. The JW's are standing by him, well no surprises there then.

Salman Rushdie

Whether or not you agree Salman Rushdie has been awarded a Knighthood. What I want to know is what has it got to do with the Pakistan Government or its people? More to the point the Pakistan Government statement that made reference positive reference to suicide bombers killing Rushdie puts them in the same league as Al Qaeda. It doesn’t matter that the statement was retracted later, it was made and that is a terrorist act. I am disgusted with their Government saying such things. You can bet your back teeth that there will be those think this is a message for action. The Pakistan Government is nothing short of a terrorist organisation. All the moves Pakistan has made to stamp out terrorists seems to me to be simply a ploy to make them look good in the eyes of the international community. They do not deserve our friendship or help. This is just another example of how Islam is trying to stifle freedoms we in the west enjoy. We should not ignore this threat to our freedom. Know your enemy, whoever he may be!

B-Lair

So Tony has now got a job trying to sort out the middle east. Yeah like thay will ever happen, but maybe when Iran gets H-bombs. . . . . . . . .

Iraq again

Saddam Hussein and his minority ruling Baath party were Sunni Muslims. The new government are majority Shia. Is it any wonder that the Shia are now seeking revenge for the horrors that were visited on them by their tyrannical leader. That anyone can assume that they will play the game by 'our' rules beggars belief. I am not being racist when I say that Arabs are a very tribal people. That which we think of as normal behaviour is not the way that Arabs think. Tribal law is the law of the land not the democracy that we in the west are trying to push on them.

It has been about a year since the world kicked off on protests about the Danish cartoons. Many people (Moslems) were killed in the riots that exploded from the furore. What was it about? Well simply it is supposed to be haram (bad) to make an image of the good old prophet Mohammed or any religious dignitaries. This would this would be very commendable if it wasn't so damned laughable. Visit almost any mosque and you will notice that it is named after the leader. How is this any less idolatrous than pictures of long deceased religious leaders.

We in the west enjoy certain rights and freedoms. These freedoms must be protected. They were long fought for and blood was spilled. If others don’t like the rights and freedoms we enjoy then they should be allowed to vote with their feet. No one is keeping them here. No one is twisting their arm. In fact the rights and freedoms we enjoy they can use to leave us if the cannot tolerate the society we have built.

Personally I think ALL religion is a load of bollocks be it Jews, Catholics, Anglicans, Islam, Buddhists or whoever, even Jehova's Witnesses. Religion is about controlling the little people. Making them do what someone else wants them to do. The way the world is today we cannot afford any kind of religion.

An' about time too

Our esteemed leader Tony B Liar says," We are a tolerant nation, if you cannot accept that then don't come here". Well good for him. He could have said something sooner, like 1997, but then he has no future as primo so he can afford to make such bold statement. I seem to remember saying some months ago just about the same thing, but then I have no future as primo either.

We are spending £100 million ever year on translating official forms and literature into something like 70 different languages. Well you might ask why we have to help those who don’t understand English and I would tend to agree, but when some one has been drawing benefit for 10 years and still doesn't speak English then you have ask are they taking the piss.

I had reason to take my company to court in a foreign country. My lawyer not only didn't speak to me after the initial interview, he never gave me one piece of official paper in English. When I insisted he told me to, 'go to a translator' at my cost on top of his SR 25,000 fee.

My question is why should we, give people consideration in our country that they deny us in theirs, and more to the point, if they must have the facility, why don’t they pay for it. It is not our fault they can't speak English other than we encourage them not to learn by making it easy for them to live here in lingual oblivion.

Sharia Law, crap.

So already there are moslems convening Sharia Courts in the UK to deal with their problems. We should not put up with it. It is against the law. And to paraphrase certain moslems "against our human rights". If you don't like the way we do things here get the out. There are 70 countries in this world that are Islamic states take your pick.

Our system may be flawed but it is our system. Love it or hate it it's what we have. Do not come to my country and try to change a system that has been building since long before your prophet was a violent warring paedophile.

Wasted effort

So a mere teaching assistant took a Church of England school to court because they wouldn't let allow her to wear her veil in class. This assistant was assisting in teaching English! How can a person whose job relies on teaching meaning, inflection and sound cover her face and be able to do the job?

She has no right to insist on wearing her veil, it is not in the Quran, these people are just trying to piss everyone off.

Islam does not fit into England very well and it certainly does not fit into a Church school.

There are countries that allow this to happen. So answer me this, if it is so important to wear a veil why are these people not there instead of trying to breakdown our country?

Answer: Because there are not the rich pickings to be had in those countries. Freedom is what one man says it is. Women are not equal and in some places not allowed to work.

I am going to be rude: Piss off!

You what!

A Moslem taxi driver, Abdul Rasheed Majekodunmi, refused to take a blind woman and her dog in his cab because in Islam they are not allowed to contact with such animals. Given that he broke the law, in that he was discriminating against a disabled person, why has he still got a licence?

Jane Vernon complained to his bosses and the owner, Niven Sinclair, refused to listen. He said, "It wasn't very important", and that she should, "have more respect for other people's culture". I would have come back with Islam is not very important either. It's place in the modern world is flawed and unnecessary.

Common sense prevailed and he was fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,200 for failing to comply with the disability act. Yet even after that he was defiant. He stated that he would continue to refuse to carry dogs in his cab. Sounds to me like someone who wants to be an EX taxi driver.

Our law comes before any culture, if Moslems don't like that then I suggest that they may take advantage of our freedom of choice and go to a country that allows such behaviour. We don't want to change our ways, we like England the way it is. If Moslems don't like what we have to offer, why come here in the first place. We have freedoms here that don't exist in Islamic countries. It is such a shame that they come here to escape inhumane regimes and bring all the crap with them.

If you are a Moslem and think I am being racist then you couldn't be more wrong. I write to protect my country from the influx of those that would destroy it. I write to inform that the rot has set in. I write because I have no political voice in our administration. I write because I have the freedom to do so, freedom you would deny me if you ever have the opportunity.

Veiled threats!

I can't say I have ever particularly liked Jack Straw. Mainly because he said once that Christians and Moslems can work together. On that I feel he is wrong.

However, his comments on the wearing of hijab veil or burqa are right on the mark. Short of insulting Moslem women it is he who was insulted when a woman in a veil said "It's nice to meet you face to face". It might have been for her but he could not see her face. The constant bleating that 'it is our culture' does not hold water. It is our country and it is not our culture. There is no where in the Qur'an that says women should cover up.

I have lived in the Middle East for most of the last 6 years and although it is not normal for westerners to come into much contact with Arab women it does happen. At the doctors or dentist etc it is the norm for the receptionist to be an Arab lady. Now most people would have no problem understanding the clipped English that these women use, but if you are hard of hearing as I am it is a problem. I need to see and hear what someone is saying. If I can't see the lips then half of my communication reception has gone and understanding is limited.

There is an easy answer to this, I could just ask for a westerner to speak to which would be OK in the Middle East, but not here. Such a request would be met with officious asshoes telling me I am being racist, which is not the case. Far from it, in fact were I a racist I don't think I would have spent so much time living and working in other countries.

I have said before I don't give a shit about the colour of a man's skin, what I care about is his nature, is he a nice guy? Does he mean me any harm? It is sad today that the latter is probably the most important thing when meeting someone new. It cannot be argued that the majority of people who want to hurt me are of Arab/Pakistani appearance. That is not racist, it's a fact of life.

The so called peaceful religion is no more peaceful than water isn't wet. Argue though they may Islam is a problem. It is the express intent of Islam to make the whole world an Islamic State. There will be no elections, it will come to pass. Islam already decides what I can do and say in my own country. Just writing this is a no-no and could have me following in the footsteps of Salmon Rushdie. All I am doing here is voicing my opinion, it is my right, yet there are those that would snuff out my life in an instant for doing so.

In Islamic teaching everyone is a Moslem, it's just that some of us have yet to realise it. This is born out by the fact that a religion that only came into existence 1427 years ago claim that Adam (of Adam & Eve fame [probably 10,000 years ago]) was the first Moslem.

I am not a particularly religious person (I lapsed some years ago), but I resent these new boys on the block stealing a history that was not theirs to steal. We are continuously being told that we must respect other peoples religion but where is it in the rule book that we must respect a thief.

We are often told that we are a multi-cultural country. I would ask when did that happen? When did we cast a vote for this?

This is our country, we have our laws, and we have our customs. As such our laws and customs MUST take precedence over the laws and customs of visitors to this country. Unless this is so there will be bloodshed on the streets of England. It will be a sad day when it happens, but I feel sure it will.

When a senior politician voices an opinion we should listen because like it or not he may be right. Failure to do so will result in every woman wearing a veil and every English man bowing down to pray to some force of evil the like of which most of us cannot imagine.

Call me a scare monger if you like, it's your choice, but be sure when this comes to pass you acknowledge that you read it here first.

It is time to take it back.

Someone is stealing something from me; there is nothing I can do to stop them. I watch the news and see Islamist protesting the words of the pope. I cannot protest against their protest. Why? Because it would be racist and because I would offend a minority group. The fact that they are racist towards me and that they offend me is not a point to argue. I am white so I am racist. They are Moslems so they can't be. I have a hard time dealing with that.

I have travelled far and wide and one thing I do know is that colour is important the blacker you are the lower down the social scale you are. I once witnessed an Indian woman refuse to sit next to a Pakistani woman on an aeroplane because she was a "Paki". One Arab on the same flight from Paris to Oman called the flight attendant a "fucking useless bitch", simply because she woke him up to tell him to put on his seat belt. The aircraft was taxying to the runway. Later in the flight I noticed his briefcase was full of pills not just for self use but I mean full. Obviously a dealer taking the profits. Another Arab complained that they didn't have milk on board for the baby despite being told at the airport that he should ensure that he had milk as the galley didn't have enough on board. He still complained

The Committee for Racial Equality (CRE) has an annual award for blacks in the media. Clearly this is a racist event where only blacks are honoured. If they had a similar event for whites this would redress the balance, but they don't, and I am supposed to be racist. The CRE are cleaning up their act, but it is still an organisation that deals with White on Black racism and not Black on White racism. This is against their remit, yet they are allowed to get away with it.

Personally I don't give a shit what colour a mans skin is, I am more concerned with what sort of person he is. I am concerned with what his religion is because he might be a serious danger to me and mine. Yes I do perceive Asians as dangerous. Since the IRA stopped bombing us Asians and Arabs have killed a lot of us mere white folk, you will excuse me but that is a fact not racist.

Islamic fundamentalists daily preach from a book that calls for the extermination of Jews and infidels. They say Islam is a peaceful religion yet they call for the execution of the Pope because he repeated the words of a medieval writer. Earlier this year the Danes were pilloried because they dare to explore the probability that Islam was and still is having an effect on our right to free speech.

Let us understand this, Islam is about taking over the world. It sees every single one of us as a Moslem that hasn't yet understood. The Islamic Republic of UK is becoming a reality. No not scaremongering it is a fact. There are many in the UK that are working towards it. Our Government will not stop it unless we tell them to.

The Prophet Mohammed has been proven to have been a sex crazed violent Paedophile but will any mossie admit that, no! There are provable facts to support this but to his followers he is untainted.

I once told an Arab that I would not buy Arab products on principle, he thought that was unfair and didn't see the similarity of their own situation whereby the do not purchase Danish goods.

They of course are allowed to have principles we are not, which brings me back to my opening statement. What is being stolen from me? My rights, my liberty, my freedom. All of which our foreign visitors will deny me but cry Racist if I were to deny them the same rights.

Whose country is this? Certainly not mine. My 'Government' will bend over backwards to help those who seek to deny me my freedom but will not lift a finger to help me when my rights are abused. I am a stranger in my own country.

It is time to take it back.