Sunday, March 27, 2016

What is Blasphemy?

If you have your own idea of which way you want to live your life, it can be hurtful if others say you are wrong, and laugh at, and criticise that which you consider to be good and honourable. Generally you have to get on with life. Where religion is concerned International law says you have rights which allow you to follow the path in life you chose, providing it is legal, and other people are required to allow you that. So now you have your religion when others say you are wrong, and laugh at, and criticise that which you consider to be good and honourable you can incite the Blasphemy laws of your country.

Even though we are a Christian country we can, if we chose, be Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Janeist, Jedi, or even Atheist. You can chose to be whatever you want it’s your right. Of course Blasphemy is a law that takes away that right.

It is illegal to adversely comment on someone else’s religion, blasphemous! Here in England it is doubtful that that could happen with Christians. In some counties you can be taken to court for trial of this ‘capital’ crime. Certain proponents of religion use Blasphemy laws to get even in petty domestic disputes. This can’t happen here in the UK, but in many countries people die for supposedly committing this crime.

Blasphemy law, by its very nature, is an infringement on freedom of thought, freedom of expression, freedom of speech. Any religion or life style that cannot survive criticism is itself on shaky ground. In Islam if, as a Christian, you are accused of blasphemy you can avoid punishment by converting and becoming a Muslim. Islam is a cult where there is no compulsion to be a part, yet if you are accused and refuse to convert you could well be HUNG by the neck until dead (This is currently the case in Pakistan).

The oddity is that even tough people accuse you of blasphemy they cannot give evidence in court because to do so would be blasphemous repeating what you said. No witness testimony is, in any civilised country, a good enough reason to throw the case out of court. However in Pakistan once someone has accused you no Judge wants to be seem to be lenient so he will draw out the case for years hoping that people will forget about it. He will do this because if the accusers don’t like his judgement they will kill him.

So as an atheist is it possible to be a blasphemer?

Mo and the Old and New Testament

Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him [Muhammad] any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly.

clip_image002St. Thomas Aquinas (Contra Gentiles, Book One, Chapter 6, Paragraph 4)
Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism (1225 – 7 March 1274).


Excuse Me. . . .

Saturday, March 19, 2016

Thoughts on Islam

1. Don’t tell me my thoughts are bollox. You display your obvious waste of the education budget.

2. Islam is not a race. The word 'racist' is designed to stifle the truth and it works, look at Rotherham, Rochdale, and Oxford. 1000s of children abused and raped because those who were charged with caring didn’t want to be thought of as racists!

3. Islamaphobia is a non-word designed to stifle the truth. A phobia is an irrational fear. Fear of Islam is a very rational stance to take.

4. Germany, Denmark, Belgium, Norway, Sweden, France! Can you not see the problem? These are not a few radicals, these are 100s of thousands of people with the killer instinct, who will have sex with any child/woman they chose, and you can include animals in that. They have no morals.

5. Often the use of bigoted is a very bigoted action as it is here

6. You cannot coexist with people who want to kill you.

7. There are at least 300 million Muslims in the world who would kill you as soon as look at you. That is equal to the population of the USA. Most of the so called moderates would not bat an eyelid if the 300 million killed you.

8. It has never been acceptable to sexually abuse children, not even in Mo's day. Mo encouraged his followers. He said to his uncle when he married a 'matron', "Why did you not marry a child then she could play with you and you with her."

9. Ayesha was 4 when Mo was first 'attracted' to her. She was 6 when he married her and practiced 'thighing' (sex without penetration) and 9 when he first had penetrative sex with her.

10. Even in Mo's day girls of this age would have died giving birth, moreso than today.

11. Moslems today still follow the 'perfect example'. A man who had sex with children, who ruthlessly beheaded his enemy: even children who mocked him were murdered, who despite having 11 wives proper had a further 6 'common law' wives/slaves. Mo can only be described as a voracious sexual predator.

12. Having 4 wives was encouraged so that widows of his soldiers were cared for. That is not the case today. Moslems have 4 wives because there is an endless stream of sex.

13. Sex and killing are predominant features of Islam. To this you can add destruction of culture and property. The radicals all think they are Mohammed Rising.

14. If this is how Moslems want to behave as abhorrent as it is to us its OK in their country. But to bring their evil to our shores is beyond reproach, totally unacceptable and we may have to take up arms to protect ourselves from this evil.

15. Anyone who side with this global trash is a traitor to all we believe in.

16. If you want to see Islam in action go and live in the Middle East like I did. 1y Oman 1y Kuwait 3y Saudi Arabia. I well remember 'white eyes' being taken and killed. Paul Johnson (beheaded) and Bob Scoggins (two bullets to the temple while parking his car) to name but two.

17. Moslems will end our culture, but only because myopic limp wristed liberals, such as yourself, have no idea of the danger that we face. They believe we can reason with these killers, we cant! It Islam or nothing, there is no room for manoeuvre.

18. When a 10 year old child sees suicide bomber as a career choice you cannot argue with that logic. When the pregnant mother of four children sees herself as a suicide bomber, you cannot argue with that logic. When you see people who are paid to beat their fellow muslims if they are late to prayers, you got it, you can't beat that logic.

19. I know the names of every 'white eyes' that owns land in Saudi. It is a very short list consisting of no one, yet Arabs own large swathes of London.

20. If you cannot see the wood and only see trees you are not paying attention!

So don't go calling me a racist or accusing me of Islamaphobia much less spouting 'bigot' because you have no idea what you are talking about. Traitor trumps all these. I have stood on both ends of a gun and have no penchant for either end, I dined with OBL and was convinced that was my last meal, I am not an islamaphobe, I am not a racist, I am not a bigot, I am, however, a realist. The time is coming when we will have to choose sides, when we will have to capitulate or fight, when we will have to stand up for us. You have to choose, will you fight for our country? Or will you capitulate?

Monday, March 07, 2016

Dear Abdul

If you want to preserve the modesty and purity of your women then please stop thinking of them as sex objects and raping them. Show some self control and keep your dick in your pants.


EXCUS ME BUT. . . . . . . . . . . .I find it difficult to understand this modesty crap. The simple answer is to stop shagging anything that moves. Have some self control.

Sunday, March 06, 2016


I am sick and tired of moslem invaders saying they didn’t understand the boundaries,  when they are arrested for sexual assault. What is worse is the judges fall for it. It has nothing to do with boundaries, to a Moslem there is no boundary. A woman is there for them to satisfy their lust. If the girls fight all the better. Islam is an idolatrous cult of Satanist and they have no morals.

Reference here

Remember the 10 year old boy raped in an Austrian swimming pool? The perps excuse was “I had a sexual emergency” Bastard!!!

Reference here

Thursday, October 08, 2015

Middle Easterners and Africans are overrepresented as rapists in the Nordic Countries

Sweden – Rapists from the Middle East and Africa overrepresented up to 23x compared to natives.

Finland – Rapists from the Middle East overrepresented 13x whilst Africans are
overrepresented 12x compared to natives.

Norway – In Oslo, 2007-2010, 100% of perpetrators convicted of assault rape had non-Western Background and were often asylum seekers.

Denmark – 51.5% of convicted rapists had immigrant background, with Iraqis, Iranians, Turks, and Somalis, being dramatically overrepresented.

Source: Fria Tider – Mohamed fann Jesus efter våldtäkten – får stanna trots att han dömts till utvisning.

Thursday, October 01, 2015


I don’t give a shit about democracy when it comes to that paedophile worshiping terrorist/coward Anjem Choudary. This is a man who though he hates us here in GB is  living off our hard earned cash to the tune of £25,000 a year tax free. You and I are giving this hate preacher a salary while he plots to kill innocent people. His ‘rights’ are of no importance whatsoever.
The face of Islamic EVIL
This man thinks we owe him while all the time he is plotting to kill real British people. Our government should run him out of the country now. There are 70 Islamic Republics in the world let him pick one and go there.  He is not worth the ink in the bill of rights.
How dare this government allow this violent racist to stay in our country and pay him while he plots to kill real British subjects.
He may have been born here and educated here but he will never be British. He lacks the fundamental properties of a Brit.  He is by association a child abuser, by faith a terrorist, by his own voice an enemy of the state.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Limit Freedom of expression

Limit freedom of expression that’s what muslim opponents of Charlie Hebdo are saying. I think they are right! My freedom of expression should be limited to the number of words I can write on any given topic in my life time.

In Islam it is forbidden to portray the Paedophile Prophet. Those people who chose to follow the flawed teachings of the PP are bound by that rule. They think that Charlie Hebdo should not be publishing such things as jokes about the PP. They are entitled to their thoughts. But I do not follow the PP or the Koran so that rule does not apply to me. I think the Koran is an abomination to the west and should be treated by those of us in the west that value our freedoms in the same way as they wish to treat the Hebdo magazine.

The muslims we hear about the most, are those that are sexual deviants. The rapists and the child molesters. Why do we hear about them? First off because there are so many of them. And because they seem to think they have the right to rape and molest because it is in their culture. I agree it maybe, but their culture doesn’t belong here. If this is the way they wish to carry on there are 70 odd Muslim States where this is acceptable behaviour We should repatriate the to one of those. It is not acceptable here, nor should it ever be.

If you come into my house you do not put your feet on the furniture if you do I will ask you to leave.

If it is acceptable to limit my freedom then we must also limit the freedom of the PP. His so called teachings are fairy stories, probably dreamed up whilst high on Qat, I mean really talking ants and flying ponies. Reading the qura’an, (and I have read it) is like reading the words of someone who is out of touch with reality. As a guide to desert survival it probably works, but as a way of life in the modern world it really is a non-starter.

What muslims should be striving for is to free their own thoughts. To get away from the koran which is a people controller and make their own decisions in life . Think for themselves. If god has all the answers and we are made in the image of god then we have all the answers too.

I cannot believe that any god of any religion wants all those who don’t believe to die at the hands of their followers. It makes no sense, especially not a god of peace. How silly does that sound?



Wednesday, September 23, 2015

What equality?


Excuse me but………… this is not about the women but rather about the inadequacy of Muslim men, who only think in terms of getting sex.

Bangladesh: Islamic jihad group issues international hit list of bloggers, activists and writers

September 23, 2015 6:50 pm
By Robert Spencer

How barbaric. In the United States we don’t murder writers for offending Muslims. Instead, we excoriate them as “racist,” “bigoted” “Islamophobes,” accuse them of all manner of offenses, no matter how wild the charge, and ostracize them in the name of “dialogue,” “multiculturalism,” “public safety” or whatever works. You see, we are much more civilized.

Ansarullah Bangla Team

“Militant group publishes global hitlist of bloggers, activists and writers,” by Jason Burke, Guardian, September 23, 2015:

An Islamic militant group in Bangladesh has issued a hitlist of secular bloggers, writers and activists around the world, saying they will be killed if its demands are not met.

The list will raise fears that Islamic militant violence within the unstable south Asian country could take on an international dimension.

The targets in the list include nine bloggers based in the UK, seven in Germany, two in the US, one in Canada and one in Sweden. Some are Bangladeshi citizens living overseas. Others are dual nationals or citizens of the western nations.

The list was issued in a statement on the internet by the Ansarullah Bangla Team (ABT), a group that has been blamed for a series of murders of bloggers and activists in Bangladesh over the last 18 months. All those killed have been prominent critics of extremist religious doctrines, especially in Islam.

The acting leader of the ABT and two close associates were arrested earlier this month in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, on suspicion of involvement in the murder of a secular blogger earlier this year….

“Our weapon is [the] pen, and we can use it without hurting anybody. We just want to make people conscious about their rights. So that nobody can use them to fulfill bad intentions,” said Ananya Azad, a Bangladeshi blogger who has been forced into exile in Europe and is on the list.

There has been no previous indication that the ABT was targeting bloggers overseas and the list will worry security authorities in Europe and the US….

It is unclear if the ABT has the capability to carry out their threats, but its call for action may prompt individuals to mount “lone wolf” attacks.

Police have charged an ABT organiser and four supporters with the murder of a 27-year-old blogger, Washiqur Rahman, in Dhaka in March.

Rahman’s death came just weeks after a Bangladesh-born American atheist blogger was murdered in Dhaka by machete-wielding attackers.

The murder in February of Bangladeshi-born US citizen Avijit Roy, a science writer and blog moderator, prompted outrage around the world. His US-based widow is among those named on the new list the group appear to have issued.

Officials suspect the ABT is close to the Ansar ul-Islam organisation, which is part of al-Qaida in south Asiaand launched by the extremist organisation about a year ago.

The statement featured a logo comprising a black flag carrying the seal of the prophet Muhammad, often favoured by extremist groups, and the phrase: “We do not forget, we do not forgive” in English.

Al-Qaida has publicly praised violent operations by the ABT and has hailed activists charged with the murder of bloggers as “lions of the international community”.

The new list is accompanied by an incoherent demand to strip bloggers of their citizenship. It appears to be addressed to the government of Bangladesh’s prime minister Sheikh Hasina, though many of those on the hitlist have dual nationality or are citizens of Britain, the US or European nations.

“Cancel the Bangladeshi citizenship of enemies of Islam and [Muslim religious] education, atheists, apostates, unbelievers, anti-Islamic … bloggers, agents of India … otherwise they will be killed wherever they can be found in the Almighty’s world,” said the statement.

The origin of the list is unclear, and some have doubted it is an official statement from the ABT in Bangladesh, but instead compiled or published from the UK or elsewhere in the west….

Authorities in Dhaka have been previously criticised for requesting local bloggers and activists to avoid provocative statements on sensitive religious issues.

Human Rights Watch, the international campaigning group, last month called for the government “to recall that its duty is to uphold the constitution and protect people’s lives, as well as their religious freedom”.

“It’s shocking that Bangladesh authorities not only failed to protect the bloggers despite complaints to the police about threats against them, but instead are proposing self-censorship,” said the spokesperson….

Why is that so shocking? That’s exactly what happened to Pamela Geller and me in the United States to Pamela Geller after jihadis attacked our free speech event in Garland, Texas last May: even people supposedly on the Right, such as Bill O’Reilly, Laura Ingraham, and presidential candidate Donald Trump recommended we practice self-censorship in the face of violent intimidation, rather than defending the freedom of speech.

Those on the list say they are aware of the dangers of their activism. “I can’t give you assurance that I can’t be hurt here also. Fundamentalists have threatened that they will come and kill me,” said blogger Azad.

“I can’t say that I am fully safe, as the fundamentalists know where I am residing. I can’t say what will happen in future, but I can give you this assurance that I will write until the end of my life.”

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

I fail to see…….

…. how these educationally limited numb nuts can believe that Islam is the answer to anything.


Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Muzaffarnagar woman seeks abortion after being raped at gunpoint by her father-in-law... but clerics order her 'to treat her husband as her son'

Nine years after Charthawal village’s infamous Imrana case, which had put the Islamic law under the public scanner, a similar case has come to light in a neighbouring village of Muzaffarnagar district.

A 28-year-old woman created ruffles in the local administration and the Muslim community on Thursday by moving an application before District Magistrate Kaushal Raj Sharma to arrest her father-in-law and allow her to abort her seven-month pregnancy.

“My husband has been working in Dubai for the last two years. My father-in-law has been sexually assaulting me at gun point since 2013. I remained silent because he used to threaten to kill me. He also video recorded his act and threatened to make it public if I opened my mouth. When I told my husband about it, he blamed me for making a false allegation against his father. When I finally told my parents, they suggested me to take legal action against my rapist father-in-law,” the victim said.

Sharma confirmed that he had received the woman’s complaint and said: “I have asked the chief medical officer and the police to probe the case. Further action would be initiated against the culprit under the law.”

Clerics, however, have jumped into the case and have declared that, henceforth, the husband of the victim will be treated as her son.

Avoiding any comment against the father-in-law who repeatedly raped and blackmailed the victim, Maulana Mohammad Nazar of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind said: “As per the Sharia law, the baby in her womb is her husband’s brother. Her husband must divorce her, even if his father looked at his wife with lust.”

In 2005, 28-year-old Imrana was sexually assaulted by her father-in-law Mohammed Ali.

The local community panchayat had treated the case as that of adultery instead of rape, and ruled in the light of Sharia that her marriage with her husband stands null and void as the Islamic law considered sexual relations with both the father and the son as incestuous.

Instead of punishing the father-in-law, the panchayat ordered her to treat her husband as her son and his father as her husband.

Imrana was made to suffer after she dared to continue living with her husband.

Samajwadi Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav had supported the Islamic panchayat’s decision

Sharma confirmed that he had received the woman’s complaint and said: “I have asked the chief medical officer and the police to probe the case. Further action would be initiated against the culprit under the law.”

Clerics, however, have jumped into the case and have declared that, henceforth, the husband of the victim will be treated as her son.

Avoiding any comment against the father-in-law who repeatedly raped and blackmailed the victim, Maulana Mohammad Nazar of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind said: “As per the Sharia law, the baby in her womb is her husband’s brother. Her husband must divorce her, even if his father looked at his wife with lust.”

In 2005, 28-year-old Imrana was sexually assaulted by her father-in-law Mohammed Ali.

The local community panchayat had treated the case as that of adultery instead of rape, and ruled in the light of Sharia that her marriage with her husband stands null and void as the Islamic law considered sexual relations with both the father and the son as incestuous.

Instead of punishing the father-in-law, the panchayat ordered her to treat her husband as her son and his father as her husband.

Imrana was made to suffer after she dared to continue living with her husband.

Samajwadi Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav had supported the Islamic panchayat’s decision.

Sharma confirmed that he had received the woman’s complaint and said: “I have asked the chief medical officer and the police to probe the case. Further action would be initiated against the culprit under the law.”

Clerics, however, have jumped into the case and have declared that, henceforth, the husband of the victim will be treated as her son.

Avoiding any comment against the father-in-law who repeatedly raped and blackmailed the victim, Maulana Mohammad Nazar of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind said: “As per the Sharia law, the baby in her womb is her husband’s brother. Her husband must divorce her, even if his father looked at his wife with lust.”

In 2005, 28-year-old Imrana was sexually assaulted by her father-in-law Mohammed Ali.

The local community panchayat had treated the case as that of adultery instead of rape, and ruled in the light of Sharia that her marriage with her husband stands null and void as the Islamic law considered sexual relations with both the father and the son as incestuous.

Instead of punishing the father-in-law, the panchayat ordered her to treat her husband as her son and his father as her husband.

Imrana was made to suffer after she dared to continue living with her husband.

Samajwadi Party president Mulayam Singh Yadav had supported the Islamic panchayat’s decision.

Excuse me but……………These people are totally fucked up.

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Monday, December 08, 2014

Parent FAIL!

Encouraging a child to extreme violence should be a lock up crime!



Saturday, November 29, 2014

Of all the cowardly bastards!

Muslims would have you believe that women in Islam are looked after and are treated equal and not as not second class citizens. Well I think this girl would disagree with that.

Here crime was that she didn't want to marry a man who was many years older than her and already had a wife. Daddy then threw acid in her face. Now no one will marry her.

So how equal is she? By what law did her father feel he should do this to his daughter? Did he get punished for this?


Excuse me but………… This is not a peaceful act. It is simple barbarism performed by an insecure little man who needs shooting.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Excuse me but if you rape, murder, and  enslave this flag has only one purpose as an indicator for the snipers bullet.

Saturday, September 20, 2014

This is Islam......

KARACHI, Pakistan — A liberal Muslim scholar who had been accused of blasphemy for a speech he gave during a visit to the United States was shot and killed in Karachi on Thursday, the city police said. The scholar, Muhammad Shakil Auj, was the dean of Islamic studies at the state-run University of Karachi. Unidentified gunmen on a motorbike attacked the vehicle he was riding in on his way to a reception at his honor at the Iranian Consulate. Dr. Auj was shot in the head and neck and died immediately, officials said. A female student in the back of the car was shot in the arm and was treated at a hospital. A week earlier, a visiting religious scholar at the same Islamic studies department, Maulana Masood Baig, was also shot dead by unknown attackers. Dr. Auj, 54, had earlier complained to the police about death threats he began receiving after delivering a speech in the United States in 2012, his colleagues and the police said.

Wednesday, March 05, 2014

Thieving Bastard Lock him up!!!

Retired magistrate swindled more than £23,000 in benefits by lying about his savings - but is spared jail

Rahmat Ali Raja, 75, dishonestly claimed benefits for 10 years

The ex-local councillor was awarded an MBE in 2005 for services to the community in Pendle, Lancashire

At one point, the former magistrate had savings worth £102,000 across nine bank accounts

But he claimed he had just £5,601 in order to claim the extra cash 
Raja pleaded guilty to two counts of dishonestly failing to disclose information and said: 'I made a mistake'

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Excuse me but............who let him off?

Thursday, March 22, 2012

The Somali Problem

Lets get it over with and


the fuckers!

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

What is a fascist?

Fascists aren't known for their open mindedness.

Its their way or nothing.

But then neither are the Politically Correct brigade.

Its their way or nothing.

But then neither is Islam.

Its their way or nothing.

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Taranneh Mousavi

Song and rape

The blog Iranian009 has interviewed one of Taraneh’s friends:

Taraneh M, the young woman we reported on two days ago has been murdered. […]. As we said we have been in contact with one of her friends […]. […] We asked her friend (who will be referred to as Sh. here) to give us a short interview and provide us with more details about this appalling tragedy.
“Taraneh was very beautiful and very kind, she used to sing with a beautiful warm voice and played the piano with skill. I cannot imagine that all this life and beauty should be buried under dust and dirt, without mercy.”

Sh. is speaking haltingly, and I ask her:

When did the family learn that the body had turned up?

“They went to Ghazvin yesterday to get her burned body. But as much as we asked them they wouldn’t tell us any details and neither did they tell us where they want to bury her. They have been threatened heavily and are very afraid.”

Was Taraneh arrested on 7th Tir (28th June) near Ghoba mosque?

“Yes. On that day, Taraneh was wearing a green shawl and manteau and high heeled shoes and because she also had beautiful green eyes, she probably caught the attention of the plain clothes agents. But she wasn’t participating in the rally and she cried and said so many times to the agents, but they threw her into a van with other detainees. Her car was parked in the vicinity and she was on the way to her Beauticians’ Training Establishment which is situated near Hosseinie Ershad.”

And then they brought her to a detention center?

Yes, they brought her and about 40 other blindfolded boys and girls secret detention center, a building with high walls on Pasdaran Street, and put them in a large room. They were harassing the girls very much and Taraneh’s interrogation took longer than the others’…

Did Taraneh give her phone number to the others there?

“Yes, when she had come back to the others from her long interrogation she said she had been harassed and she asked some other girls and boys to call her parents and some of her friends and tell them that she had been arrested. She was crying all the time, and when they allowed all the girls except her to call home briefly she grew even more worried.

Then they took all the detainees away from this building, some were taken to Evin and others to Nobonyad police station. Only Taraneh they kept with them, which worried all the other detainees.”

And afterwards, were her family and friends contacted?

“Yes, the other detainees who were freed the same evening or in the next days and had the numbers were all worried about Taraneh’s state, as they had seen the savage behaviour of the agents. They called Taraneh’s family and friends and told them she had been arrested.

And did the family follow up on her?

“Yes, after some days they found her Pride car near her workplace but there was no trace of her until last week…”

…when an unidentified person called…

“Yes, an unidentified person, probably one of her abductors, called and said Taraneh had a moral problem and that she hadn’t been arrested at all. He said she had been raped and her womb and anus had been torn and she had wanted to kill herself by throwing herself in front of a car. He said she had been brought to Emam Khomeini Hospital in Karaj and that she had also tried to kill herself there with a serum tube.

The family immediately went to the hospital but Taraneh’s name wasn’t registered at the hospital. However one of the nurses confidentially told one of her friends that some days previously a girl answering these particulars had been brought to the hospital in a state of unconscious and had been removed again after a couple of hours.

Hearing this, we guessed that Taraneh had probably been brought to the hospital in the last moments of her life after suffering repeated rape. We grew very worried.”

At this stage, what enquiries did Taraneh’s family make?

“Our main problem was the family’s silence and the fear they had that the story would come out. Taraneh’s mother and father are very religious and over sixty, Taraneh was their only child, which they had had after years of praying and longing and medication, and they had given her a good life. But when this happened they became very afraid and didn’t talk to us any more. But after all we are her friends too and have a right to know where her body is and where she will be buried!”

Is there no information at all about the funeral ceremony?

“No. Yesterday the family were informed that a burned corpse answering Taraneh’s description had been found in the desert between Karaj and Qazvin. The family has been threatened severely not to talk about their daughter’s arrest.”

Now that this story has come out in the media and in the weblogs, do you think the truth will be found out?

“I just want Taraneh’s voice to go on, and our call that our most beautiful friend has been cruelly taken from us, that they have raped her brutally for several days and then burned her lifeless body and tossed her out in the desert.

When Taraneh sang, her beautiful voice was always in my ear, but from yesterday until now I have only been hearing her screams. Taraneh’s suffering was over, but our pain and suffering will remain with us as long as we live, she was our Taraneh (=song).”

EXCUSE ME BUT . . . . . .Which ever way you look at it these people did this because they could. The Mullahs, the politicians, the president are all guilty because they are doing nothin to stop it. Ahmadinejad is a puppet of the Islamic Fundamentalists. He is not a leader he is a follower.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Muslims clash with police after burning poppy in anti-Armistice Day protest

Muslims clashed with police after burning a large poppy in protest at Britain's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which was timed to coincide with Armistice Day's two-minute silence.

Muslim protestors demonstrate near Hyde Park in London on Armistice Day

Muslim protestors demonstrate near Hyde Park in London on Armistice Day Photo: AP

Armistice Day: protesters burn poppy: Police escort the Muslim protestors into the underground train station after they began a protest in the Kensington area of London

Police escort the Muslim protestors into the underground train station after they began the protest Photo: AP

Andy Bloxham

By Andy Bloxham 3:58PM GMT 11 Nov 2010

About 35 Islamic protesters, dressed in dark clothes and with many masking their faces, carried banners and chanted slogans such as "British soldiers: terrorists".

The group confronted police officers and briefly fought with them, leaving one officer with a head injury requiring hospital treatment, and three arrests were made.

Around 50 counter demonstrators from the far-right English Defence League gathered nearby but officers kept the two sides apart.


EXCUSE ME BUT . . . . . . .this is so wrong these people must be deported and the wearing of a mask in this situation should be an arrestable offence. You can bet your life if we did the equivalent over in Saudi or Pakistan of Iran we would be beaten mercilessly.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Rape within marriage is 'impossible', claims Muslim cleric

A senior Muslim cleric in charge of Britain’s largest group of sharia law courts has claimed that there is no such thing as rape within marriage.

By Tim Ross, Social Affairs Editor
Published: 7:00AM BST 15 Oct 2010

Maulana Abu Sayeed of the Sharia Council of Britain

Maulana Abu Sayeed of the Sharia Council of Britain Photo: AFP/GETTY

Sheikh Maulana Abu Sayeed said that sex without a wife’s consent was “not good” but could not be called rape.

Sheikh Sayeed, president of the Islamic Sharia Council, was criticised by police and moderate Muslims, who warned that his remarks would make women more reluctant to report sexual assaults.

Rape within marriage has been illegal in Britain since 1991. But according to Sheikh Sayeed, rape is defined in Islamic law as adultery by force. Therefore, if a husband forces himself upon his wife the attack cannot be termed “rape”, he said.

In an interview with the website The Samosa, he said: “Clearly there cannot be any ‘rape’ within the marriage. Maybe ‘aggression’, maybe ‘indecent activity’.

“It is not an aggression, it is not an assault, it is not some kind of jumping on somebody’s individual right. Because when they got married, the understanding was that sexual intercourse was part of the marriage, so there cannot be anything against sex in marriage. Of course, if it happened without her desire, that is no good, that is not desirable. But that man can be disciplined and can be reprimanded.”

Dave Whatton, Chief Constable of Cheshire and spokesman on rape for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said most rapes were committed by someone known to or in a relationship with the victim.

“It is a fundamental principle that sharia law should not replace the laws of the UK,” he said. “Putting out views that rape can be dealt with in another way fundamentally undermines everything we are trying to do.”

Excuse me but . . . why are there Sharia courts in Britain?

Wednesday, August 04, 2010

13 Year Old Yemeni Child Bride Tied Up, Raped – Bled To Death

Posted by jagoindia on April 13, 2010

SHUEBA, Yemen (AP) — A 13-year-old Yemeni child bride who bled to death shortly after marriage was tied down and forced to have sex by her husband, according to interviews with the child’s mother, police and medical reports.

The girl’s mother, Nijma Ahmed, 50, told the Associated Press that before her daughter lost consciousness, she said that her husband had tied her up and forced himself on her. “She looked like she was butchered,” she said about her daughter’s injuries.

Elham Assi, 13, bled to death hours after she spoke to her mother and just days after she was married to a 23-year-old man. She died on April 2 in the deeply poor Yemeni village of Shueba, some 200 kilometers northwest of the capital. Her husband, Abed al-Hikmi, is in police custody.

The practice of marrying young girls is widespread in Yemen where a quarter of all females marry before the age of 15, according to a 2009 report by the country’s Ministry of Social Affairs. Traditional families prefer young brides because they are seen as more obedient and are expected to have more children.

Legislation to ban child brides has been stalled by opposition from religious leaders. There has been no government comment over the case.

The girl — one of eight siblings — was pushed into marriage after an agreement between her brother and her future-husband to marry each other’s sisters to avoid having to pay expensive bride-prices — a common arrangement in Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East.

According to police notes from the interrogation of the husband, he was upset because he could not consummate their relationship and felt under pressure to prove his manhood.

Assi’s mother said she also tried to persuade her daughter to have sex with her husband so as not to shame the family.

Al-Hikmi took his young bride to a nearby medical clinic, asking a doctor there to administer her tranquilizers so she would not resist his advances. The clinic said it refused.

Al-Hikmi then obtained performance enhancing pills, according to the police interrogation, and that night completed the act while she screamed.

The next day, he returned to the same medical clinic carrying Assi because she could not walk.

“I told him not to go near her for at least ten days,” said Dr. Fathiya Haidar. She said Assi’s vaginal canal was ripped.

A forensic report obtained by the AP showed that Assi’s injuries were much more extensive, including extensive tearing around the vagina and rectum, suggesting that there might have been additional intercourse after the clinic visit.

Her mother said she visited Assi later that day, where she found her daughter fading in and out of consciousness.

“She whispered in my ear that he had tied her up and had sex with her violently,” she said. “I said to her husband, what have you done, you criminal?”

She said al-Hikmi told her that the young bride was just possessed by spirits and said he would take her to a folk healer to cast them out. Hours later, Assi was dead.

“She asked me to stay beside her,” her mother said.

The practice of marrying young girls is widespread in Yemen and has drawn the attention of international rights groups seeking to pressure the government to outlaw child marriages.

“Early marriage places girls at increased risk of dropping out of school, being exposed to violence, abuse and exploitation, and even losing their lives from pregnancy, childbirth and other complications,” said UNICEF’s regional director Sigrid Kaag, in a statement Wednesday condemning the death.

A February 2009 law set the minimum age for marriage at 17, but it was repealed and sent back to parliament’s constitutional committee for review after some lawmakers called it un-Islamic. The committee is expected to make a final decision on the legislation this month.

The issue of Yemen’s child brides received widespread attention three years ago when an 8-year-old girl boldly went by herself to a courtroom and demanded a judge dissolve her marriage to a man in his 30s. She eventually won a divorce.

In September, a 12-year-old Yemeni child-bride died after struggling for three days in labor to give birth, a local human rights organization said.

Excuse me but . . . . .  The mother called the husband a criminal yet she allowed this to happen she even asked the girl to give in to the husband. I think she should be locked up along with the husband.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Understanding Muslim Beliefs .....GOOD READ !!

The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the United States, especially in the minority races!... by Rick Mathes

Last month I attended my annual training session that's required for maintaining my state prison security clearance. During the training session there was a presentation by three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained each of their beliefs. -

I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Imam gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video. When he was finished, a time was provided for questions and answers.

When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Imam and asked: "Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad (Holy war) against the infidels of the world. And that by killing an infidel, which is a command to all Muslims, they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?"

There was no disagreement with my statements and without hesitation, he replied, "Nonbelievers!"

I responded, "So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill anyone who is not of your faith so they can go to Heaven. Is that correct?"

The _expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just gotten caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

He sheepishly replied, "Yes." I then stated, "Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering Protestants to do the same in order to go to Heaven!"

The Imam was speechless. I continued, "I also have problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!

Let me ask you a question. Would you rather have your Allah who tells you to kill me in order to go to Heaven or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to Heaven and He wants you to be with me?"

You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam hung his head in shame. Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with Rick's way of dealing with the Islamic Imam and exposing the truth about the Muslim's beliefs.

I think everyone in the US should be required to read this, but with the liberal justice system, liberal media, and the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized.

Please pass this on to all your e-mail contacts. This is a true story and the author, Rick Mathes, is a well-known leader in prison ministry

I came by his because a friend in the US prison service sent it to me. Snopes interviewed Mathes aand he confirmed it did actually happen. The prision service are reluctant to agree with him.
Whether or not it happened I am in possession of an Islamic book published by a revered Saudi publisher[1] which says and I quote " The day of judement will not come untill all the Jews are dead". I commented on this to an Egyptian doctor friend of mine and she said it was wrong. "What it should have said was 'infidels'." Who am I to argue?

1. I used to read the books of Saudi publisher Daressalam at work in Saudi. My Saudi friends would say they are the best books to buy on Islam until that is that I started to point out things like that above hen they would say my books were forgeries. Go figure!

Saturday, January 09, 2010

IISLAM, peaceful?

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace

"He who fights that Islam should be superior fights in Allah's cause"
Muhammad, prophet of Islam

2010.01.08 (Khyber, Pakistan) - Three children are among five civilians murdered by a Shahid suicide bomber outside a mosque.
2010.01.08 (Bajaur, Pakistan) - Two people are blown to bits by a Taliban roadside bomb.
2010.01.08 (Karachi, Pakistan) - Five mourners at a funeral are shot to death by sectarian Jihadis.
2010.01.07 (Khanaqin, Iraq) - Three Iraqis are cut down by a Jihadi bomb.
2010.01.07 (Yala, Thailand) - A man is ripped in two by a Religion of Peace nail bomb.
2010.01.07 (Hit, Iraq) - Women and children are among the dead when Mujahideen detonate planted bombs around the bedrooms of four homes.


Sunday, December 20, 2009

This shit can be stopped

These criminals can be stopped.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

No Borders PAH!!!

Greenpeace, limp wristed lefties,veggies, vegans and a whole host of other save the planet types have jumped on the band wagon of the NO BORDERS Brigade, who as far as I can work out have the idea that we should open our borders to all and sundry.

Fine idea except its a one way street. Open our borders and every one will come here and swamp us, bankrupting our benefit system. Corrupting our culture. and generally lowering our standards. Having been to some of the places that would dump their unwanted on us I don’t think there will be a rush of westerners wanting to go to the shit pits of the world. Net result we suffer. 

On the other hand we could export all the Greenpeace, limp wristed lefties,veggies, vegans and a whole host of other save the planet types to these places and give them an education in why there NO BORDERS policy is a non starter.

This is not a racist rant it is simple common sense. This is a small island. What we have here was paid for with the blood of our soldiers on many occasions. It didn’t just get given to us. It was earned. It is unfair that anyone should be able to just step off a plane and expect to take from us what we and our fore fathers bled for and paid taxes for, for centuries. Our lives as we have them now were not cheap.

I am not saying foreign nationals are not entitled to a better life but they could try fighting for it at home instead of coming here and overloading our system. When our society collapses they will all bugger of home and leave us to the wolves.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

A nation of peados

12-year old Girl Dies During Childbirth
Associated Press
September 14, 2009
SAN'A, Yemen -- A 12-year-old Yemeni child-bride died after struggling for three days in labor to give birth, a local human rights organization said Saturday.
Fawziya Abdullah Youssef died of severe bleeding on Friday while giving birth to a stillborn in the al-Zahra district hospital of Hodeida province, 140 miles (223 kilometers) west of the capital San'a.
Child marriages are widespread in Yemen, the Arab world's poorest country, where tribal customs dominate society. More than a quarter of the country's females marry before age 15, according to a recent report by the Social Affairs Ministry.
Youssef was only 11 when her father married her to a 24-year-old man who works as a farmer in Saudi Arabia, said Ahmed al-Quraishi, chairman of Siyaj human rights organization, which promotes the rights of children in Yemen.
Al-Quraishi said that he stumbled upon Youssef in the hospital while investigating cases of children who had fled from the fighting in the north.
"This is one of many cases that exist in Yemen," said al-Quraishi. "The reason behind it is the lack of education and awareness, forcing many girls into marriage in this very early age.
"Impoverished parents in Yemen sometimes give away their young daughters in return for hefty dowries. There is also a long-standing tribal custom in which infant daughters and sons are promised to cousins in hopes it will protect them from illicit relationships, he said.
Al-Quraishi said there are no statistics to show how many marriages involving children are performed every year.
The issue of child brides vaulted into the headlines here two years ago when an 8-year-old Yemeni girl went by herself to a courtroom and demanded a judge dissolve her marriage to a man in his 30s. She eventually won a divorce, and legislators began looking at ways to curb the practice.
In February, parliament passed a law setting the minimum marriage age at 17. But some lawmakers are trying to kill the measure, calling it un-Islamic. Before it could be ratified by Yemen's president, they forced it to be sent back to parliament's constitutional committee for review.
Such marriages also occur in neighboring oil-rich Saudi Arabia, where several cases of child brides have been reported in the past year, though the phenomenon is not believed to be nearly as widespread as in Yemen.
EXCUSE ME BUT . . . . . . . THis sort of thig is bound to happen when you lord ad glorify the name of a pedophile as your spiritual leader . . Mohammed.

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

US father guilty of prayer death.

Man found guilty over death of his daughter for praying rather than seeking medical help.

A man accused of killing his 11-year-old diabetic daughter by praying instead of seeking medical care has been found guilty of second-degree reckless homicide.

Dale Neumann, 47, was convicted over the March 23, 2008, death of his daughter, Madeline, from undiagnosed diabetes.

Prosecutors argued he should have rushed the girl to a hospital because she could not walk, talk, eat or drink.

Instead, Madeline died on the floor of the family's rural home as people surrounded her and prayed. Someone called an ambulance when she stopped breathing.

Neumann, who once studied to be a Pentecostal minister, testified that he believed God would heal his daughter and he never expected her to die. God promises in the Bible to heal, he said.

"If I go to the doctor, I am putting the doctor before God," Neumann testified. "I am not believing what he said he would do."

Excuse me but . . . . did it never occur to this joker that if God made everything then he made doctors. Going to the doctor is not putting the doctor before God but simply using one of his tools.

This idiot deserves to go to jail.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Winning is all

A small schoolboy at the sports day breaks the winning line with his egg still on his spoon. Overjoyed at his prowess as racing balancer of eggs he raises his arms in the air pronouncing for all present that he is the WINNER!

A teacher witnessing this takes the lad to one side and totally destroys his moment. "There are no winners its just a bit of fun", she says.

This does not make the slowcoach at the back feel any less last. Everyone knows he/she was last. All that has been achieved is one 5 year old's moment of glory has been dashed by some teacher with her PC head up her arse.

Its no wonder that our children are failing if we are teaching them that winning is not important.

Winning is the most important thing we have. It means that someone was the first to discover penicillin, it means that some one was first to discover X-rays, it means that someone was the first to find a cure for a cancer; it means that someone was first to invent anesthetic . . . . need I go on.

Winning is important to me. Had someone not had the enthusiasm to say we can do this and discovered inert optical plastics I would be blind.

We don't speak German because we won the war. We will loose the peace if we don't win anymore.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Women flogged for wearing trousers

Police in Sudan have arrested 13 women in a raid on a cafe and flogged 10 of them in public for wearing trousers in violation of the country's strict Islamic law, one of those arrested has said.

The 13 women were at a cafe in the capital, Khartoum, when they were detained on Friday by officers from the public order police, which enforces the implementation of Sharia law in public places.

One of those arrested on Friday, journalist Lubna Hussein, said she is challenging the charges, which can be punishable by up to 40 lashes.

"I didn't do anything wrong," said Ms Hussein.

Islamic Sharia law has been strictly implemented in Sudan since the ruling party came to power in a 1989 military coup.

The force randomly enforces an alcohol ban and often scolds young men and women mingling in public. Public order cases usually involve quick summary trials with sentences carried out shortly afterward, as was the case with 10 of the women arrested on Friday. They were flogged and fined 250 Sudanese pounds (£74).

Ms Hussein and two other women chose to go to trial. On Monday she was summoned for questioning and now awaits a decision from the prosecutor on when the case could go to trial.

Women in northern Sudan, particularly in Khartoum, dress in traditional outfits that include a shawl over their head and shoulder. Western dress is uncommon.

Ms Hussein said she decided to speak out because flogging is a practice many women endure in silence. She even sent printed invitations to the press and public figures to attend her expected trial.

"Let the people see for themselves. It is not only my issue," she said. "This is retribution to thousands of girls who are facing flogging for the last 20 years because of wearing trousers. They prefer to remain silent."
Excuse me but . . . . . . . Dont think this cant happen here it can and it does. The Islamic Republic of Great Britian is just around the corner.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Saudi Judge Blames Women For Domestic Violence

Okays Husbands To Slap Wives

Posted in May 11th, 2009 by Glenn Church in Saudi Arabia
Few countries contrast the twenty-first century with the values of antiquity as Saudi Arabia does. A wealthy, modern state would seem to have a few progressive ideas. Not so with the Saudis.

A Saudi judge has ruled that it is okay for husbands to slap their wives if they spend too much.

That wasn’t all Judge Hamid Al-Razine had to say. He noted, “women’s indecent behavior and use of offensive words against their husbands were some of the reasons for domestic violence in the country.”

Domestic violence is on the rise in Saudi Arabia in recent years. Of course, the woman is to blame.

It would be unthinkable to consider otherwise in a society that does not allow women to drive or men and women to mix in public. Yet, the same society allows a 47-year-old man to marry an 8-year-old girl.

All this is done in the pretext of protecting women or upholding morality. Is there really that much difference between the Saudis and the Taliban? Both cherish oppressive ideologies and suppress women.

Why, yes, there is a difference. The Saudis sell us their oil.

Americans die in Afghanistan with one of the pretenses being the liberation of women from a repressive ideology. In Saudi Arabia, they work with the Saudis to provide the world with oil. For that, the Saudis always get a free ride, unless you are a Saudi woman.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Mosque inquiry will cost taxpayers £100k

Taxpayers will pick up a £100,000 bill for the planning inquiry which resurrected plans for a Black Country mosque, it has been revealed.

The cost of the four-day hearing will be met by Dudley Council after the Government’s planning inspectorate overturned its decision to reject the £18 million proposal.

The authority was forced to hire security staff to police the summit at the inspector’s request - but will not receive a penny from Whitehall to cover costs.

The decision to allow the appeal for the project in Hall Street, Dudley, was this week announced after the public inquiry in June.

Dudley Council boss David Caunt described the decision as a “sad day” for local democracy saying it ignored the 22,000 people who signed a petition in opposition.

And Councillor Caunt said that the £100,000 bill rubbed salt in the wound.

“I’m very frustrated that a one man government-appointed judge and jury can turn up, listen to the arguments for four days and drive around the borough before coming to the conclusion that he knows better than the locals." The councillor added: “And then we have to pick up the bill for it".

“The security was requested by the inspector himself, but we have to pay,” he went on to say. The council chief warned the price of the inquiry could even run over the authority’s initial £100,000 estimate because of the tight security measures.

Work on the mosque, featuring a 65-feet minaret, could start before Christmas. However the plans could yet be scuppered by a land-swap deal which states that the building must be “substantially” built by the end of the year.

Dudley Muslim Association now has outline planning permission for the scheme, but still needs to submit a detailed application which the council has up to 13 weeks to determine.

When the site was transferred to the association in 2003 there was a legal agreement that if the project was not “substantially” completed by the end of this year the land would be returned to the council. Muslim leaders have called for an extension to the deadline.

Mushtaq Hussain, secretary of Dudley Muslim Association, said: “We always maintained the condition was subject to us getting planning permission and having a reasonable and realistic time to get the project completed".

Monday, February 16, 2009


Wealthy bride's kin allegedly killed poverty-stricken groom's relatives

PATNA, India - Eight members of a man's poverty-ridden family were shot and beheaded before their bodies were thrown into a river in eastern India after he secretly married a wealthy girl, police said Wednesday.

Police in the eastern state of Bihar found the eight bodies floating in a river and have charged 15 people, mostly from the girl's family, with the murders. The weekend killing took place after 21-year-old Ratan Mandal eloped with 18-year-old Kanchan Kumari, afraid their families would never approve due to an old social rivalry.

"The girl's family invited the boy's family for a meeting on the pretext of settling the dispute, but killed all eight and beheaded them," said Raghunath Prasad Singh, a senior police officer from Bhagalpur, where the incident took place. Lawless region Bhagalpur, one of India's most lawless regions, has been notorious for revenge and honor killings. Men and women are still murdered across the villages of eastern and northern India for daring to marry outside their caste.

In May last year, a young couple was murdered by the girl's family in northern India for marrying within the same village, considered taboo in many communities.

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Paki or Brit

Am I right in thinking that PAKI is short for Pakistani? Just an abbreviation?
Prince Harry calls a mate "Our little Paki friend" and is forced to apologise two years later. This guy was a mate of his for heaven's sake! Am I right in thinking that "Brit" is short for British?

Should the SunNewspaper be forced to apologise every time it prints the word Brit or The Brits are coming? Is the word Brit offensive? Is "Scot" Offensive? "The Scots are coming". Another Sun Newspaper Football Clash Headline classic. What about Ozzie? Kiwi? Pommie? Limey? Where or when will this lunacy end?

The Cornish call all holiday makers "Grockles" Anything wrong with that? If a Pakistani called you "His Brit friend" Would you feel offended? Would you demand an apology on National TV? Of course not. Del Trotter refers to "The Paki Shop" in one episode of Only Fools and Horses. (Now overdubbed for UK Gold with the offending word taken out - the episode is when they build a nuclear fall out shelter). Should Sir David Jason now apologise? Should the writer John Sullivan apologise? Should the BBC apologise? What about the Fuzzywuzzies? "Dads Army" What about "You stupid Kraut"? Fawlty Towers . Both still being broadcast regularly with no overdub.

The Idiots are at it again trying to stir up racial hatred. It's just madness surely? I'm happy being a BRIT, BRITISH, ENGLISH, POMMIE, LIMEY or whatever. I don't care a fig. I only care when I'm called a racist. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO NEXT YEARS "BRIT AWARDS" ON THE TV. LUCKILY,THANKS TO THE ZEALOTS, RACISTS AND BIGOTS THERE WILL NEVER BE A "PAKI AWARDS". Oh no indeed, because all the Pakis will be at The Brit Awards. And us Brits won't mind at all will we?

There's something rotten in the barrel and nobody in government or local politics has the guts to stand up and say " GROW UP THE LOT OF YOU". If you agree then pass this on. If not then you still have the Democratic right to ignore it ............. (well for the time being anyway)!

Monday, February 02, 2009


The Palestine you are encouraged to see looks like this

However there is a Palestine they dont want you to see and it looks like this

Tuesday, October 14, 2008


Just incase you didnt know in Sheffield you cannot get buried on a Saturday unles you are a Muslem.

Excuse me but. . . . . . . . Whose country is this?

Monday, September 22, 2008

Why oh why oh why

OIC to move UNGA against caricatures

Staff Report

ISLAMABAD: A resolution against the publication of blasphemous caricatures of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) in various countries will be presented in the upcoming session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), an Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) representative said on Tuesday.

“The resolution will demand legislation against the publication of blasphemous caricatures of revered personalities and derogatory remarks against religions. It will also demand [sacrilegious] actions be declared a crime,” OIC Secretary General’s Special Representative on Kashmir Ezzat Kamel Mufti told a news conference.

Mufti said a particular group in America and the European Union had been launching attacks against Islam. “However, we should not get emotional and resort to any kind of violence, including suicide bombings,” he said.

Excuse me but......... it is not blasphemous if you are not religious ie a believer can be blasphemous but a non believer cant except in the eyes of those who chose to follow this nonsense.

Friday, September 12, 2008


"A nine-year-old girl has the same sexual capacities like a woman of twenty and over". Thus reads a fatwa issued by Skeikh Mohamed Ibn Abderrahmane Al-Maghraoui, according to Moroccan daily 'Aujourd'hui Le Maroc'. This immediately sparked off a hot debate, with most of the public opinion absolutely against this stance which is a permit for paedophilia, many say, among other things. Among the various stances against the fatwa (in the Islamic culture, a decree of religious character issued by Islamic experts which regulates issues of topical character), the daily reported those of extremist MP Abdelbari Zamzami and the president of association 'No one touches my children', Najia Adib. Zamzami, referring to the fact that Al-Maghraoui wanted to make his fatwa unassailable reminding that Muhammad "married Aisha who was nine", reiterated that the sheikh used the event as a pretext for this "scandalous practice". "The era of our Prophet is completely different from ours," he said on the issue. "These days a marriage of the kind would be a true injustice towards the girl. A true aberration." "Aberrant" was also the judgement of Najia Adib ('No one touches my children'), according to whom "this sheikh is simply encouraging paedophilia. If he is so deeply convinced of what he thinks, let's tell him to get his daughter married". But perhaps, she explains, this unknown sheikh was searching a little media attention. And concluded her interview with the Moroccan daily: "This type of people look at Islam from the point of view which is convenient for them. It is a restrictive vision of Islam. And it is bad. Fatwas like these show the lack of reasoning from those who issue them. I cannot understand via what intellectual road or for what mental construction they come to such aberrations". The law in Morocco envisages the minimum age for getting married at 18 years for both men and women. Marrying below this age requires the consent of the parents and of a judge. But it refers to teenagers not children.
Excuse me but. . . . . . . This is the sort of shit you get when your leader was a kiddie fiddler.
One error in the text is Mohhamad married Ayesha when she was 6 not nine. He was nowt but a dirty pervert.

Friday, August 29, 2008

A young student who was doing a photojournalism report on illeagal immigration was brutally raped by probably ten IM of middle eastern appearance in a shanty town in Calais.

These bastards are not the sort of people who we need here. They have no respect for our laws or our culture. Theirs is the only way.

Question: Why is France allowing this shanty town to exist so near the port.

Answer: They have never forgiven us for getting their arse out of a sling 60 years ago and 20years before that.

Do they really care if these bastards come over here I very much doubt it.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

This might solve one problem

The British Solution to Save Petrol

Brown wants us to cut the amount of petrol we use......

The best way to stop using so much petrol is to deport 3 million illegal immigrants!

That would be 3 million less people using our petrol. The price of petrol would come down.....

Bring our troops home from Iraq to guard the Channel....

When they catch an illegal immigrant crossing the Channel, hand him a canteen, rifle and some ammo and ship him to Iraq ....

Tell him if he wants to come to Britain then he must serve a tour in the military....

Give him a soldier's pay while he's there and tax him on it.....

After his tour, he will be allowed to become a citizen since he defended this country.....

He will also be registered to be taxed and be a legal resident..... .

This option will probably deter illegal immigration and provide a solution for the troops in Iraq and the aliens trying to make a better life for themselves.. ....

If they refuse to serve, ship them to Iraq anyway, without the canteen, rifle or ammo.....

Problem solved.....

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Ssri Lankan Police CSU are nothin but barbarians

Mannar CSU rapes pregnant woman

[TamilNet, March 28, 2001 18:07 GMT]

"Wijikala was screaming inside the building. I heard her pleading 'I have nothing to do with the Tigers. I am a family woman. Please do not do this to me'. Then some CSU men came out and told me that they were forcing Wijikala to have sex with them and threatened to rape me as well. One of the men tried to strip my clothes. When they saw that my son was asleep on my lap, a Policeman dragged him away into one of the buildings in the CSU compound as I begged them not to hurt him. Two men then pinned me down on the van's floor while another stripped me and raped me. I was screaming and pleading when a Policeman put his foot on my mouth to stifle me. Inside the building they forced Wijikala, who was standing naked, to strip my underwear. I was hung upside down in a knot from a pole placed between two tables, with my hands and feet tied. Then the men in the room poked our genitals and tortured us until dawn", said Sivamani Sinnathamby Weerakon, the young mother of three who was arrested by the Counter Subversive Unit (CSU) of the Police in Mannar on 13 March. Wijikala Nanthan, 22, of Alavetty in Jaffna who was arrested with Sivamani, is pregnant.

The two women were produced before the Mannar district judge M.H.M Ajmeer by the CSU at his residence and were remanded in judicial custody for fourteen days. The judge instructed the Mannar prisons officer to have the women examined by a medical officer forthwith. Wijikala, according to her relatives, is pregnant and was raped repeatedly by Policemen in CSU custody.

The Mannar Bishop and human rights activists said Wednesday that the CSU has often been in the habit of arresting women such as Sivamani and Wijikala from various parts of the Mannar district to rape and exploit brutally under the pretext of interrogation and extended detention under the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Emergency Regulations.

Sivamani said that more than ten uniformed persons surrounded the Aasika lodge in Uppukkulam, a suburb of Mannar town, on 13 March around 11 p.m. Sivamani was staying in the lodge with her son as her husband had gone to Vavuniya to find work. Wijikala and her husband, Shanmugam Nanthan, were staying in the room next to hers.

The men from the CSU entered the lodge and checked the men and women separately. They separated Sivamani and accused her of being a member of the Liberation Tigers. Sivamani denied their charges and showed them her family album to prove that she was a person with children and a family. She told the CSU personnel that she was staying in the lodge with her son. They had then dragged her son from bed to the main hall of the lodge where they were questioning the inmates. The boy was taken to a corner of the hall and questioned by the CSU men. Sivamani said she could see that the boy was too sleepy to answer any of their questions and threats.

"However, they came back and threatened me, claiming that my son had confessed that I was a trained member of the Liberation Tigers. I cried and pleaded with them that it was obvious that my son was too sleepy and could not tell them anything. But they insisted that I was a Tiger. Then they got Wijikala search my person and me to check her".

"Then we, Nanthan, Wijikala, my son and I, were taken in a white van to a place in the town, which I recognised the next day as the compound in which the Mannar CSU office is located. There, Nanthan and his wife Wijikala were pulled out of the van and were dragged into a building in the compound. After a while I heard Wijikala screaming and pleading. Some Policemen who from the building, told me in lurid detail about how they were forcing sex on Wijikala and threatened that they would do the same to me. They me told me that the OIC wants to see me. But I begged them not to harm my little son".

Sivamani was then raped in the van while her six-year-old son was dragged away into the CSU office. She was thereafter taken to the CSU's Officer in Charge (OIC) Suraweera. Sivamani saw Wijikala standing stark naked in the room surrounded by more than five CSU men.

"The OIC, a tall fair man with a beard, ordered me to strip naked when I was made to stand before him with most of my dress torn and stripped. I was whipped with thick wires when I refused to remove my clothes. The pain was so unbearable that I was compelled to take off my skirt and blouse. But the CSU men insisted that I should remove my under wear as well. I refused. Thereupon a man poked a stick into my underwear and tried to tear them. Then they forced Wijikala to remove my undergarments and pushed me to the brightly lit part of the room close to the OIC".

Sivamani said that Inspector of Police (IP) Suraweera, the OIC, had lasciviously scrutinised her private parts when she was pushed near him by the other Policemen in the room.

She was then tied up and hung upside down in a crouching position on a pole placed between two tables in the room and tortured until dawn, 14 March. The torture was so severe that Sivamani and Wijikala had agreed to say that they were military trained members of the Liberation Tigers who had brought bombs to Mannar from the Vanni.

Three days later they were ordered, while in the custody of the CSU, to sign confessions typed in Sinhala to the effect that they were members of the LTTE, had come to Mannar with bombs etc,

Sivamani said she was from the village of Ramanathapuram in Kilinochchi . She was married to a Sinhalese fifteen years ago when she was fourteen. She has three children. Her husband, Ranbanda Weerakon Banda of Matale, left Kilinochchi in 1994 to find work in Vavuniya. Sivamani heard in 1999 that he had married another woman there. She had come to Vavuniya and met her husband in November 2000. Ranbanda had then put her up in a house in, Nelukkulam, a suburb of the northern border town.

A few days later he had brought his mistress to the same house. Earlier this month Sivamani decided to leave the house as she could no longer stand the squabbles with her husband's mistress. She had therefore set out to Mannar so that she could go back to the Vanni. Her husband had, however, gone along with her and put her up at the Aasika lodge and returned to Vavuniya. Despite being informed by the ICRC about her wife's situation, Ranbanda has not come to Mannar so far to see Sivamani, sources said.

Sivamani said that CSU personnel have threatened both her and Wijikala not to give evidence against them if there is a case in courts.

Monday, July 07, 2008

Sharia Law

So a top judge has said Sharia Law could play a role Britains Legal system. This is definately a case of being out of touch with the masses. WE dont want it! Many of the Moslems who came here to escape the horror of Sharia Law dont want it. So arent we glad twats like him don't make the law.

There are about 70 Islamic republics in the world, these are some of the poorest and most repressed, let those who want to live under Sharia Law move to one of them. Like it or not we are a predominantly Christian country and our laws are based on Christian principles. We like it that way.

Your Honour...... go wash your mouth out.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008


I find it difficult to believe that the men who found these an insult........

Posted by Picasa

..........think these are acceptable

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Oh it gets worse

The adoption of some aspects of Islamic sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable", the Archbishop of Canterbury has said.

Dr Rowan Williams said there was a place for finding a "constructive accommodation" in areas such as marriage - allowing Muslim women to avoid western divorce proceedings.

Other religions enjoyed such tolerance of their own laws, he pointed out, but stressed that it could never be allowed to take precedence over an individual's rights as a citizen.

He said it would also require a change in perception of what sharia involved beyond the "inhumanity" of extreme punishments and attitudes to women seen in some Islamic states.

Dr Williams told BBC Radio 4's The World At One: "It seems unavoidable and, as a matter of fact, certain conditions of sharia are already recognised in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system.

"We already have in this country a number of situations in which the internal law of religious communities is recognised by the law of the land as justifying conscientious objections in certain circumstances."

Prime Minister Gordon Brown's spokesman insisted that British law would be based on British values, and Sharia law would be no justification for acting against national law. But he also said concessions could be made in specific instances, such as a relaxation of the law on stamp duty to avoid it being paid twice when Sharia-compliant mortgages were used by Muslims.

Mr Brown's spokesman said: "In relation to Sharia law, there are instances where the Government has made changes - for example, we have changed the regulation around stamp duty to include Sharia-compliant mortgages." They involve two transfers of property, so in theory stamp duty would be payable twice - but is in fact paid only once.

The spokesman went on: "Our general position is that Sharia law cannot be used as a justification for committing breaches of English law, nor should the principles of Sharia law be included in a civil court for resolving contractual disputes.

"If there are specific instances like stamp duty, where changes can be made in a way that's consistent with British law and British values, in a way to accommodate the values of fundamental Muslims, that is something the Government would look at. There is always going to be a debate about this issue."

Excuse me but . . . . . . . . . . . . if there are muslims in this country who are not happy with our laws there is a simple answer. There are 72 Muslim republics in the world they could move there.

Why are we thinking of changing our laws for foreigners. I have spent some time abroad and know that they would not change their laws for us.

Story: An arab driver with no insurance, licence or tax on his poorly maintained car crashed into an american. The police were called and the case went to court. Although the evedence was clear, the Arab was in the wrong, the case went against the American for two reasons:-

A: The arab had no money.

B: Had the American not been in Saudi the arab would never have hit the American.

There is a word for this kind of behavior, I thought corruption might fill the bill but it is much more than that. Racism may sort of say something near to the mark. Whatever it is it is rotten and it's the way these people want this country to be.

We should not stand for it. We should make sure our leaders know that we are not prepared to accept other peoples law in our country. Loudly